Page 97 - 4187
P. 97

97

                    Our argument/ proposal/ strategy ... is based on the concept / theory of P.
               •     Now we shall ... appeal to the concept/ notion/ theory of P.
                        ... touch upon the problem/question/ issue concerning P.
                    Further I / we shall talk on/paint in more detail Р/ formulate the criterion of P.
                    To show that P, I / we shall ...
                      …  postulate/ state / apply/ derive the principles of Q.
                      …  admit the theory/ postulate/ suggestion/ view of Q.
                      …  frame an extension of the paradigm/ notion of Q.
                      …  put forward a hypothesis / model of Q.
                      …  present/ propose an algorithm for Q.
                      …  develop/ design/ apply a formalism of Q.
                      …  impose restrictions on/ place (put) constraints on Q.
                      …  employ/extend the law/rule/thesis that Q.
                    Here we can ...
                      … add/ mention/ note/ indicate/ reiterate/ repeat/ say that P.
                      ... point out/ allude to the publications on the subject.

                      1.3 References to authors and bibliography

                      1.3.1 References, citations, comparisons

               •     According to F, P / Following F, I will refer to P as Q.
                    We can follow F in assuming that P.
                    This issue originates from F's [NN].
                    This result was obtained by F. Such problems are fully discussed by F in [NN].
               •     How the micromirror works is described by F.
                    These factors are viewed by F to be of secondary importance
                    Such cases would support/ conflict with F's analysis.
                    Such detail rarely characterized F's publications.
                    This is where F's central proposal becomes relevant.
                    Standard treatments of P, such as [NN], point out that Q.
               •   –  F's  article/ analysis sets out to provide a definition for P/ raises many questions.
                  –  F's   hypothesis/ proposal is a provocative one/ rests on two basic ideas, P and Q
                     ... argument/ idea/ point ... is that P.
                  –  F's   name is virtually unknown/ is well-known today.
               •     F   ...is known for her/ his work on women's health.
                           ...helped turn the study of P into an experimental science.
                           ...made a significant contribution to the treatment of P.
                           ...conceives the terms “system” and “relation” basically in static terms.
               •     In her study / .. In [NN], the author ...
                           … identified/ discovered/ established P.
                           … proved that such an operation is feasible.
                           ... waged a debate on the problems of bioethics.
                           ... joined the debate by pointing to P.
                           ... is trying to establish Р/ states that P.
               •     Bates  concedes  that  other  forms  of  translation  may  be  important  but  their
                     inherent  simple-mindedness  banishes  them  from  the  scholar’s  study  as
                     unworthy subjects.
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102