Page 99 - 4187
P. 99

99

                    This  method  continues  to  be  present  in  current  communication  studies  /    The
                     realization that P is gaining ground / Almost all the work on this theory deals
                     with P, …
                      …  as an example, take [NN].
                    These  approaches  are  usually  confounded  in  the  literature;  ...  (for  detail),  see
                     [NN].
                    This view provokes misunderstanding on the subject. ... For detail, see [NN].

               •     Many scholars tend to identify P in a narrow sense / Researchers ignore Р/ view
                     P through the lens of linguistics / The standard treatment of the problem is to
                     represent P by Q /  These studies have reached widely differing conclusions ...
                      …  For more detail, see [NN].
               •     There is currently great interest in P /  F and S take different stands on that point
                     / Discussions of parsing strategies turn out to be about P / It is not entirely clear
                     in the literature what is meant by P…
                      …  See [NN] for subsequent discussions.
                      …  For an introduction, see [NN].
                      …  References should be made to [NN].
               •     Disagreement  arises  as  to  whether  P.  [NN]  deserves  to  be  mentioned  in  this
                     connection.
                    The reader can find discussions of P in [NN].
                    The interested reader is referred to [NN] for an introduction.
                    Readers might want to examine [NN]/ can benefit by examining [NN].
                    The writings on the subject include [NN]. The list of further reading includes
                     [NN],
               •   –  Relevant/ further bibliography of the publications on the subject is provided ...
                      …  in NN/ in the supplement to the article.

                      1.3.2 Positive comments
               •     F's investigation is …
                      … an accurate/comprehensive/ convincing/lucid analysis of P.
                      ... is an instructive/ minute/ profound/ thorough description of P.
                      ... is a good snapshot of functional analysis/ supports the theory of P.
                    F's study/analysis / theory/ proposal …
                      …offers a window into the complex of Р/sheds new light on P.
                      ... allows a principled decision on Р/ resolves the problem by P.
                      ... can yield useful predictions about Р/ sounds attractive/ is elegant.
                      ... proved to be successful/ the most transparent.

               •     F's approach / method / design / scheme …
                      … is quite/ highly creative/ effective/ fruitful/ innovative/ sophisticated/ sound.
                      … promises to furnish Р/ has proven illuminating in the study of P.
                      … appears beautiful/ is more flexible than Р/ is the best.
                      … is consistent with Р/ is consonant with the evidence.
                      … is perfect/ vital/ indispensable/ valuable for P.
                      … is superior (to anything one has tried to apply before) in numerous details.
               •     F's distinctions/ arguments/ basic points are clearcut/ consistent/ sound.
                    F's definitions of variables permit their assessment.
                    The prospect opened by this new work is P.
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104