Page 102 - 4187

102

•  Objections can be raised/ There are a number of objections ... that can be raised
against F's approach/ hypothesis.
 There are incoherences in [NN], ... of which I give one example, P.
 I would like to single out two aspects of schemas ... that I find puzzling in [NN],
P and Q.
 There are counter-examples ... that can void F's hypothesis.
 There is a controversial uncertainty in the data ... here/ in F's [NN].
 Here doubts ... appear/ arise as to whether P.
 In [NN], the bias in favor of P ... runs the risks of underappreciating Q.
 As a consequence of this bias, ... discussions of P mainly focus on Q.
 The negative side of the approach/ method ... is that P.
 Details/ Many issues (problems/ questions) ... remain unresolved.
 The trendiness of F's examples ... reflects P.
 This artificial distinction ... is unfortunate.
 This question ... receives too little attention in F's [NN]
 Such failures ... threaten the enterprise.
 Failure to differentiate P and Q ... can be disastrous.
 An uncertainty that remains ... is whether P.
 There is considerable confusion ... about P in [NN].
 Much of the confusion ... lies in a mistaken claim that P.
 The confusion arises ... because of P.
 The source of confusion ... seems to reside in P.
 Another instance of this confusion ... is that P.
 Another deficiency ... is the lack of P.
 A positive answer ... cannot be based on crediting P.
 A reason for rejecting the idea that P ... is Q.
 (Here) Mistakes ... abound (on every page).
 The controversy started in 2005, ... when F reported that P.
•  Very little of this research ... permits unequivocal cause-effect statements.
 This defect ... has eluded the investigator / escaped notice.
 The lack of consistent criteria ... leads to the misconception that P.
 The misconception that P ... lies in the confusion between R and Q.
 The misconception that P ... lies in the lack of consistent criteria for Q.
•  F ... fails to answer the question whether Р / to find unambiguous statistical
evidence for P.
… improperly cites these studies/ uses the formula in an incorrect way.
… adopts a rather controversial notion of Р/does not report data in an organized
fashion.
•  By P, ... F surely undermines the unity of the analysis.
 Р/ This ... is due to faulty manipulations/ is grossly overestimated.
… is a frustratingly speculative idea/ is a misleading comparison.
… is exactly what such research cannot take for granted.
… still tends to be dismissed by F/ leads to misunderstanding.
… shows the limits (disadvantages) of the approach.
… shows that this approach is only suited for Q.
… reveals the restricted use of the method.