Page 162 - 6202
P. 162

•     Very little of this research ... permits unequivocal cause-effect statements.
                    This defect ... has eluded the investigator / escaped notice.
                    The lack of consistent criteria ... leads to the misconception that P.
                    The misconception that P ... lies in the confusion between R and Q.
                    The misconception that P ... lies in the lack of consistent criteria for Q.
               •     F  ...  fails  to  answer  the  question  whether  Р  /  to  find  unambiguous  statistical
                     evidence for P.
                      …  improperly cites these studies/ uses the formula in an incorrect way.
                      …  adopts a rather controversial notion of Р/does not report data in an organized
                         fashion.
               •     By P, ... F surely undermines the unity of the analysis.
                    Р/ This ... is due to faulty manipulations/ is grossly overestimated.
                         …  is a frustratingly speculative idea/ is a misleading comparison.
                         …  is exactly what such research cannot take for granted.
                         …  still tends to be dismissed by F/ leads to misunderstanding.
                         …  shows the limits (disadvantages) of the approach.
                         …  shows that this approach is only suited for Q.
                         …  reveals the restricted use of the method.
                         …  seems to me a major drawback to the approach.
               •     These comments are not meant to be interpreted as an argument against F;
                  they merely suggest that P.
               •     It seems (a bit) artificial to have P in such matters restricted by Q.
                    It seems unlikely that this theory will capture all the aspects of P.
               •     It is nonsensical / an error to regard P as Q/ to presume that P.
                    It is doubtful/ I doubt that Р/ if this claim is true.
                    It is my (firm) belief/ My suspicion is that P (is erroneous).
                    It is not even a half truth to say that P.
                    It is perhaps a symptom of the reductionist tendency deplored by F.
               •     I am unsure whether P (is possible).
                    I am afraid/ not sure/1 am not convinced that P.
                    I am skeptical/ critical/ suspicious of an account which assumes that P.
               •     I object to/ refute the statement/ argument that P.
                    I cannot see any immediate gain to be had from adopting this possibility.

                     1.4. Data analysis

               1.4.1. Empirical observations, data, illustrations, examples
               •     Our description ... rests on evidence obtained experimentally.
                    Our analysis       ... rest on evidence available from biology.
                    This research/ study/ claim ... rests on findings/ materials of P.
                    This investigation ... draws on observations of P.
                    We limit the analysis to ... two phenomena (sample cases/substances), P and Q.
                    Turning to the data under consideration, ... we should consider P (we shall see if
                     P).
                    Using examples drawn from recorded conversations, ... we shall explore P.
                    It is important … to examine P and determine/ establish Q.

                                                                                                      155
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167