Page 161 - 6202

– This claim ... is felt to be (somewhat) dubious (archaic/ outdated)/ proved to be
false.
– This statement ... does not appear to be compatible with facts.
– The evidence/ analysis ... in these cases is often conflicting/ contradicts the view
that P.
– The thesis in question ... does not pertain to the perception of P.
– There is (thus) no motivation ... for the representation that F envisages.
– The methodology adopted is prejudiced in favor of the theory of P instead
– of addressing Q.
• – Such an analysis / theory / approach / separation/ connection/ identification ...
… does not much capture P.
… must be rejected in favor of P.
… is artificial / inelegant / arbitrary defective.
• – Such comments / considerations / attempts / conceptions/ definitions ...
… run counter to the principles of P.
… are of a rather doubtful kind.
… are doomed to failure/ must be judged a failure.
– are unable to meet the criteria/ lead to a paradox.
•  Objections can be raised/ There are a number of objections ... that can be raised
against F's approach/ hypothesis.
 There are incoherences in [NN], ... of which I give one example, P.
 I would like to single out two aspects of schemas ... that I find puzzling in [NN],
P and Q.
 There are counter-examples ... that can void F's hypothesis.
 There is a controversial uncertainty in the data ... here/ in F's [NN].
 Here doubts ... appear/ arise as to whether P.
 In [NN], the bias in favor of P ... runs the risks of underappreciating Q.
 As a consequence of this bias, ... discussions of P mainly focus on Q.
 The negative side of the approach/ method ... is that P.
 Details/ Many issues (problems/ questions) ... remain unresolved.
 The trendiness of F's examples ... reflects P.
 This artificial distinction ... is unfortunate.
 This question ... receives too little attention in F's [NN]
 Such failures ... threaten the enterprise.
 Failure to differentiate P and Q ... can be disastrous.
 An uncertainty that remains ... is whether P.
 There is considerable confusion ... about P in [NN].
 Much of the confusion ... lies in a mistaken claim that P.
 The confusion arises ... because of P.
 The source of confusion ... seems to reside in P.
 Another instance of this confusion ... is that P.
 Another deficiency ... is the lack of P.
 A positive answer ... cannot be based on crediting P.
 A reason for rejecting the idea that P ... is Q.
 (Here) Mistakes ... abound (on every page).
 The controversy started in 2005, ... when F reported that P.
154