Page 156 - 6202

 A process like P can help resolve the problem of establishing Q.
 These problems can be resolved by (applying/ using) P.
•  Here, we …
… accept /admit the approach / hypothesis that P.
… adhere to the assumption/ idea that P.
… posit / stipulate/ attempt to construe a model of Р/ perceive P as Q.
… presume P to be Q.
… find it necessary to constrain the notion of P to Q.
… view P in a historical perspective/ in a general aspect / through / as /
against Q.
– P is …
… conceived / regarded / viewed here as an absolute notion/ as a system/
tendency.
•  The approach/ claim adopted here ... is based on observations of P.
 Our calculation/ classification/ explanation ... is based on considerations that P.
 Our hypothesis ... is based on an assumption that P.
 Our interpretation ... is based on an examination of P.
 Our argument/ proposal/ strategy ... is based on the concept / theory of P.
•  Now we shall ... appeal to the concept/ notion/ theory of P.
... touch upon the problem/question/ issue concerning P.
 Further I / we shall talk on/paint in more detail Р/ formulate the criterion of P.
 To show that P, I / we shall ...
… postulate/ state / apply/ derive the principles of Q.
… admit the theory/ postulate/ suggestion/ view of Q.
… frame an extension of the paradigm/ notion of Q.
… put forward a hypothesis / model of Q.
… present/ propose an algorithm for Q.
… develop/ design/ apply a formalism of Q.
… impose restrictions on/ place (put) constraints on Q.
… employ/extend the law/rule/thesis that Q.
 Here we can ...
… add/ mention/ note/ indicate/ reiterate/ repeat/ say that P.
... point out/ allude to the publications on the subject.

1.3. References to authors and bibliography

1.3.1. References, citations, comparisons

•  According to F, P / Following F, I will refer to P as Q.
 We can follow F in assuming that P.
 This issue originates from F's [NN].
 This result was obtained by F. Such problems are fully discussed by F in [NN].
•  How the micromirror works is described by F.
 These factors are viewed by F to be of secondary importance
 Such cases would support/ conflict with F's analysis.
 Such detail rarely characterized F's publications.
 This is where F's central proposal becomes relevant.

149