Page 30 - 4811
P. 30
The Inverse Laplace Transform
The Inverse Laplace Transform
In order to apply the Laplace transform to physical problems, it is necessary to
invoke the inverse transform. If L(f(t)) = F(s), then the inverse Laplace
transform is denoted by
−1
L (F(s)) = f(t), t ≥ 0,
which maps the Laplace transform of a function back to the original function. For
example,
( )
ω
−1
L = sin ωt, t ≥ 0.
2
s + ω 2
The question naturally arises: Could there be some other function f(t) ≡ sin ωt
−1
2
2
with L (ω/(s + ω ) =f(t)? More generally, we need to know when the inverse
.
transform is unique.
Example 2.21, Let
{
sin ωt, t > 0,
g(t) =
1, t = 0.
Then
ω
L(g(t)) = ,
2
s + ω 2
since altering a function at a single point (or even at a
finite number of points) does not alter the value of the Laplace
(Riemann) integral.
. . . . .
This example illustrates that L 1(F(s)) can be more than one function, in
−
fact infinitely many, at least when considering functions with discontinuities.
Fortunately, this is the only case.
Theorem 2.11È
Distinct continuous functions on [0, ∞) have distinct Laplace transforms.
. . . . . . .
This result is known as Lerch’s theorem. It means that if we restrict our
attention to functions that are continuous on [0, ∞), then the inverse transform
−1
L (F(s)) = f(t)
−1
is uniquely defined and we can speak about the inverse, L F(s). This is exactly
what we shall do in the sequel, and hence we write
( )
ω
−1
L = sin ωt, t ≥ 0.
2
s + ω 2
29