Page 245 - 4188
P. 245

243

                  implicit understanding that they need one another to be better off or at
                  least will be better off by working together.  Counter-intuitively, trust is
                  not  needed  to  establish  interdependence  or  to  negotiate  to  a  win-win
                  outcome. The key word here is needed it helps if you can build trust, but

                  you can survive without it. This is fortunate because most people do not
                  negotiate with people they already trust, and consequently they  would
                  never be able to move forward with a win-win approach.  The idea of a

                  win-win can be very appealing but needs skill to achieve. Win-win is a
                  positive negotiating stance focused on constantly trying to build value
                  by  making  positive  moves  in  the  negotiation that can also  benefit the
                  other side; but only if they ‘work with you’.

                         Win-Win  -v-  Win-Lose
                          A win-win approach can deliver higher value at lower risk than a
                  win-lose scenario. A win-lose approach focuses on obtaining power over

                  the opposing party. Both parties treat the other as an enemy and try to
                  use power to bully other side into a losing position. This is not so bad if
                  you ‘win’ but at least 50% of all parties in a disputed negotiation lose.

                  Sometimes  everyone  loses.    A  win-win  approach  focuses  on  good
                  communication to develop more value, and hence the interests of both
                  parties can be satisfied. Value negotiations focus on creating value and

                  away from power. Focusing on gaining power will not guarantee value
                  whereas creating value will.
                         Summary
                         The  reticence  towards  win-win  on  the  part  of  many  naive

                  negotiators can be attributed to pre-conceived notions about ‘good guys’
                  being soft and not winning! Consequently, they consider win-win as a
                  soft  option  which  is  a  big  misconception  ...    The  whole  purpose  of

                  negotiating is to ‘win’ as much as possible with the minimum risk. Done
                  properly a win-win approach can create a much larger ‘win’ for a much
                  smaller  risk  and  allow  the  other  party  to  win  as  well  reducing  the
                  possibility they become an intractable enemy. It really does not matter

                  how much they ‘win’ what matters is that you win what you need for a
                  successful outcome. Life is all about choices and choosing a negotiating
                  style  is  no  different.  As  Falcao  says  in  his  book,  ‘Most  people  will

                  attribute  win-win  and  win-lose  as  if  the  situation  was  already
                  predefined... I strongly believe that win-win and win-lose is a choice you
                  have on how to address the situation and that making a choice actually

                  empowers us.’
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250