Page 15 - 6807
P. 15

A form is considered to be free if it may stand alone without
                            changing its meaning; if not, it is a bound form, so called because
                            it is always bound to something else. For example, comparing the
                            words  sportive  and  elegant  and  their  parts,  we  see  that  sport,
                            sortive, elegant may occur alone as utterances, whereas eleg-, -ive,
                            -ant are bound forms because they never occur alone. A word is,
                            by L. Bloomfield's definition, a minimum free form. A morpheme
                            is said to be either bound or free.
                                  Words are segmented into morphemes with the help of the
                            method  of  Immediate  and  Ultimate  Constituents,  first
                            suggested by L. Bloomfield.
                                  Coming back to the issue of word segmentability as the first
                            stage of the analysis into immediate constituents, all English words
                            fall into two large classes:
                                  1)  segmentable  words, i.e. those allowing of  segmentation
                            into morphemes, e.g. information, unput, downable, silently and
                                  2) non-segmentable words, i.e. those not allowing of such
                            segmentation, e.g. boy, wife, call, etc.
                                  There are three types of segmentation of words: complete,
                            conditional  and  defective.  Complete  segmentability  is
                            characteristic  of  words  whose  the  morphemic  structure  is
                            transparent enough as their individual morphemes clearly stand out
                            within  the  word  lending  themselves  easily  to  isolation.  Its
                            constituent morphemes recur with the same meaning in many other
                            words, e.g. establishment, agreement.
                                  Conditional morphemic segmentability characterizes words
                            whose  segmentation  into  constituent  morphemes  is  doubtful  for
                            semantic  reasons.  For  instance,  in  words  like  retain,  detain,  or
                            receive, deceive the sound-clusters [ri], [di], on the one hand, can
                            be singled out quite easily due to their recurrence in a number of
                            words, on the other hand, they sure have nothing in common with
                            the phonetically  identical  morphemes re-. de-  as found  in words
                            like  rewrite,  reorganize,  decode,  deurbanize;  neither  the  sound-
                            clusters  [ri],  [di]  nor  the  sound-clusters  [-tein],  [si:v]  have  any













                                                           15
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20