Page 226 - 6202

TiO sub (2) slurries// Critical Issues in Water and Wastewater Treatment
National Conference on Environmental Engineering 1994. Proceedings. Publ by
ASCE, New York, NY, USA, p. 751].

3.2.3. Summary-conclusion, examples

•  «Our exploration of intentional ascription in autistic children has brought the
following points to the foreground. I started off by arguing in favor of a radical
distinction between ascription ability and folk theory of mind. I examined the
sentential account of ascription content because it is a most appealing account
for many. However, I found that it is inappropriate to understand cases of
incomprehensible linguistic behavior. Finally, 1 have outlined a theoretical
background for the study of intentional ascription ability in autistic children.»
[B. de Gelder. Intentional ascription, autism and troubles with content.// Jef
Verschueren, ed. Pragmatics at Issue. John Benjamins, 1991, v.l.J.
•  «In this paper, we have presented a set of experiments that introduce students to
uitrafast science. We have discussed the relationship between the description of
an ultrashort laser pulse in the frequency domain and the time domain. Using
experimental results we have demonstrated that this relationship is constrained
by the lower limit of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Students carrying out
the experiments will become familiar with uitrafast techniques, such as
autocorrelation and laser cavity design, as well as various other concepts such as
dispersion, interference, and nonlinear optics". [T.D. Donnelly, Carl Grossman.
Uitrafast phenomena: A laboratory experiment for undergraduates// American
Journal of Physics, 1998, N 8.]

3.3. Review
•  This book is a collection of articles on P/ incorporates sociology/ the diversity of
kinds of information on/ reflects the current knowledge in P/ educational uses of
computers. The author frames the central question of his monograph as follows:
«P»; in answer to the question, the author proposes Q/ pursues the question
whether P by breaking it down into two subquestions, R and Q. Accordingly, the
book/ paper falls into two halves: P and Q. The (methodological) (sub)question
discussed in Part 1 of this monograph, reads as follows: P. The bulk of this
chapter is devoted to P. In F's approach P is viewed as Q. F develops an account
which brings out a picture of P, treating a number of problems that have
traditionally been recognized to be especially problematic areas for Q theories,
and then proceeds to investigate the nature of R and sets out to provide a
definition for Q The author brings the following example into the discussion, P.
F's approach does go a little way towards accounting for P. F's conclusions focus
on aspects such as the fact that P. F is backing up his argument with data on P.
In addition to the fact that Q, F's models offer a number of other differences: P is
defined with respect to a fixed set of features. The conclusions/ findings/ results
of F's study lend some support to the expectation that P/ further elucidate the
processes of P. F's investigation provides evidence with respect to the role of P
in R.
•  The book has a variety of virtues; I do, however, have certain criticisms. One

219