Page 185 - 6202
P. 185

  I  wish/  should  like  to  thank  F  ...  for  criticisms/  discussions/  comments/
                     objections
                    I thank the following ... for their criticisms on various versions of this paper, FF.
                    Numerous  contributions  of  F  to  the  preparation  of  this  article  ...  are  greatly
                     appreciated.
                    I would especially like to thank F ... for her useful observations on P.
                    I owe sincere thanks to F, ... whose help I deeply/ greatly/ sincerely appreciate.
                    I am grateful/ indebted to F (to the editor of this journal/ to my colleagues) ... ...
                     for comments on an earlier version of this article/ for discussing the article with
                     me.
                    Gratitude also goes to F... for pointing out/ discussing with me the data/ idea.
               •     The author       ...is indebted to F for various helpful comments.
                  ... (gratefully) acknowledges the contribution of F to the revision of this paper.
                  ... acknowledges his debt to F for proofreading the manuscript after (final) typing.
                    The assistance/ support/ help/ contribution of F ... is gratefully acknowledged/
                     greatly appreciated.

               •     Finally, I thank the anonymous reviewers  ... for comments on the penultimate
                     draft of this paper.
                    I  want  to  acknowledge  the  contribution  of  an  anonymous  referee  ...  to  the
                     revision of this article.
                    Two anonymous reviewers raised many incisive objections, ... for which 1 am
                     grateful.
                  ... to which I have done my best to respond.
                    If I have failed to do so adequately, ... the responsibility is mine.
                    If any imperfections remain, ... I am entirely to blame/ the fault is mine.

               1.7.3. Printing and publication
               •     This  work/  study/  publication  ...  was  supported  by  research  grants  from  the
                     Institute P.
                  ... was made possible by a grant from "P" Research Council.
                  ... benefited from the following research grants: P.
                    (Preliminary) Results of this investigation   ...have  been  communicated  to  the
                     conference [NN].
                    This paper/ book ... is a corrected/ expanded/ revised edition of [NN]/ was first
                     published in 1975.
                    The revision of the paper was undertaken by F.
                    NB.  «A  scientific  paper  is  a  written  and  published  report  describing  original
                     research results. The well-written scientific paper should report its original data
                     in  an  organized  fashion  and  in  an  appropriate  language.  A  scientific  paper  is
                     primarily  an  exercise  in  organization;  it  should  be  highly  stylized,  with
                     distinctive  and  clearly  evident  component  parts.  Each  scientific  paper  should
                     have,  in  proper  order,  its  Introduction,  Materials  and  Methods,  Results,  and
                     Discussion.  An  effective  way  to  proceed  in  writing  a  scientific  paper  is  to
                     answer these four questions, in order: 1) What was the problem? Your answer is
                     the Introduction. How did you study the problem? Your answer is the Materials
                     and Methods. What did you find? Your answer is the Results. What do  these


                                                                                                      178
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190