Page 184 - 6202

in Q.
... ought to be included in any description/ analysis of Q.
•  There is no real difference between P and Q. The reasoning that P proved to be
true.
 Evidence for P may be obtained in studies on the myocardium.
•  (On my analysis/ In my judgment) ... it is precisely R that distinguishes P and Q.
 Experimental data obtained at the laboratory/ used in this study ... show that P.
 Apart from its cosmological significance, ... P is Q.
 The problem of P ... is to occupy a significant place in current research.
•  Can we draw any conclusions from our analysis?
 Any P requires Q/ is either Q or R We are not able to do P with any real success.
 Any such theory must be able to deal with all PP. In regard to any subject matter
P.
 In any case, there is an overlap/ difference in PP. In any area of science, there
will be P.
 I wish ...to close with some predictions about Р/ to conclude by saying that P.
 My expectation/ hope/ prediction … is that P will provide Q.

1.7. Appendix

1.7.1. Appendices; Latin abbreviations and expressions
Latin abbreviations:
cf. confer compare i.e./ ie id est that is
e.g./ eg exempli for example N.B./ NB nota bene note
gratia well
etc. et cetera and the rest v.s./ vs./ vs versus against
ib./ibid. ibidem in the same viz. Videlicet namely
place

Latin (derived) expressions:
ad hoc for this special ipso facto by the fact itself
object
ad hominem to the man mutatis mutandis with the necessary
changes
ad infinitum to infinity par excellence preeminently
alter ego another self per se/Se itself
alter idem another exactly the prima-facie at a first view
same
ceteris other things being reductio ad a reducing to the limit
paribus equal absurdum
inter alia among other things sine qua поп an indispensable
condition
in toto entirely

1.7.2. Acknowledgments

•  Thanks to/ I thank sincerely F ... for help / for helpful comments and
discussions.

177