Page 174 - 6202
P. 174

•     This  variety  of  the  phenomena  can  be  explained  ...  by  the  model/  conceptual
                     scheme involving P.
                    The  thesis/  model/  scheme/  interpretation/  explanation  ...  proposed  here  to
                     account  for  P  is  that  Q.  Our  scheme/  hypothesis  relates  P  to  Q/  agrees  with
                     observations/ needs explanation/ is preferable.
               •     Our description ... makes explicit the influence of R on Q.
                    Our interpretation ... is dependent on P.
                    The implications (of my model) are twofold: ... P and Q.
                    The use of the technique/ model/ scheme ... enables predictions of P.
                  ... is bringing about improvements in/ constitutes a promising approach to P.
               •     Our model ... describes how PP behave/ involves/presupposes/helps clarify P.
                  ... provides an opportunity for testing Р/ unequivocal evidence for P.
                  ... can help find a solution by restructuring Q/ proves productive.
                  ... permits to develop a typology of the phenomena.
                  ... permits to decipher the history of humans.
                  ... permits to infer (reconstruct/a reconstruction of) historical connections.
                  ... is capable of providing an answer to Р/ has social aspects.
                  ... has the property (virtue) of being testable.
                  ... can be judged on the basis of potency.
                  ... lends itself to simplifications/ yields more definitive results.
               •     The need for a more acceptable classification increases/ has arisen.
                    Here ... different classifications are possible.
                            ... is an explanation of how PP are classified.
                    Our classification of PP ... is based on their function/ on the types of Q.
                            ... corresponds to/ identifies Q.
                    A variety of PP ... can be grouped into (certain) systems.
                    PP ... may be classified into a number of categories.
                         …  can be divided into two groups, Q and RI can be categorized by Q.
                         …  are simply different subcategories of experiential phenomena.
                         …  can be systematized by classifying into R and Q. P
                         …  is classed as a member of Q/ is the unifying concept for Q and R.
                         …  can be interpreted in structural terms/ may be said to belong to Q.
                         …  and Q in some way can be unified/ is a condition which determines the
                             class of Q.
                         …  is  a  motive  for  a  re-examination  of  Q/  should  be  reinterpreted  as  a
                             system.
               •     At this point, it will be useful to introduce some terminology.
                    Here a new set of terms is offered.
                    We can use the notion/ term P . .. for interpreting this type of interaction.
                    This notion ... is (can/ may) be defined by (with respect to) P.
                  ... is commonly (widely) defined as P.
                    This concept ... provides (helps describe/ can explain) P.
                  ... is appropriate to express the property of P.
                  ... enables one to distinguish P and Q.
                  ... expresses a new way of looking at humans.
               •     This term …

                                                                                                      167
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179