Page 176 - 6202
P. 176

  The  mechanisms  proposed  ...  will  actually  generate  Р/  are  (therefore)  at  least
                     plausible
                    The proposed algorithm ... is guaranteed to lead to P.
                    These principles ... provide/ may become the guidelines for explaining P.
                    The  scheme  discussed  above  ...  will  be  applicable  to/  clearly  demonstrates'
                     provides P
                    This statement ... holds for the overwhelming majority of languages.
                    Our conclusion ... holds for any set.
               •     This view is not the whole story; we may note that P. A word should be said
                     about P.
                    In other words/ Typically, in other words/ To put it another way, ... P (occurs
                     when Q. We assume, in other words, that P.
                      1.5.2. Unsolved/ remaining/ new problems; obstacles and barriers

               •     One of the more fascinating aspects of the phenomenon ... is that P.
                    One startling development ... is that P.
                    A striking feature of the calculation ... is that P.
                    At a certain point one begins to wonder whether P. It seems surprising to find
                     that P.
                    One  cannot  help  wondering  about/  One  cannot  rule  out  these  unbelievable
                     effects.
                    In the case of P something surprising happens/ has occurred.
                    Other bizarre examples abound.
                    Either way the situation seems paradoxical.
                    The secret to P lies in the mechanism Q. That leaves a disturbing puzzle.
                    That intensity poses a puzzle. The puzzle stems from Р/ is challenging to solve.
                    The widespread appeal of this view within a scientific context  ... is puzzling.
                    New  data  hint  at  the  existence/  scope  of  P.  Now  we  obtained  hints  of  how
                     cosmos evolved.
               •     (The trouble is that) ...
                    There is a discrepancy/ mismatch/ conflict/ contradiction ... between P and Q.
                    There is a striking similarity ... between P and Q.
                    It is misleading to suggest/ It is (was) strange (uncommon/accidental) ... that P.
                    It is hard/ may be difficult to calculate (judge/ imagine) P. It is not clear whether
                     P.
                    It seems impossible to tackle the problem successfully.
                    Whether P includes Q is an open question.
               •     It is the rate of P ... that will be most troublesome.
                    At present we cannot explain ... the discrepancy between P and Q.
                    What is less easy to explain is ... how P can induce Q.
                    Modeling this phenomenon ... poses a problem for P.
               •     (What matters here is that) P ...
                        ... assumed unusual shapes/ exhibited an unusual behavior.
                        ... proved greater than suspected/ may sound attractive, but Q.
                        ... revealed itself with startling clarity/ is not an incidental consequence of Q.


                                                                                                      169
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181