Page 129 - 4923
P. 129

appropriately. We need a worldwide, global mobilization for renewable energy, conservation, efficiency and a
      global transition to a low-carbon economy. We have work to do. And we can mobilize resources and political
      will. But the political will has to be mobilized, in order to mobilize the resources.


             Let me show you these slides here. I thought I would start with the logo. What's missing here, of course,
      is the North Polar ice cap. Greenland remains. Twenty-eight years ago, this is what the polar ice cap -- the North
      Polar ice cap -- looked like at the end of the summer, at the fall equinox. This last fall, I went to the Snow and
      Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado, and talked to the researchers here in Monterey at the Naval Postgraduate
      Laboratory. This is what's happened in the last 28 years. To put it in perspective, 2005 was the previous record.
      Here's what happened last fall that has really unnerved the researchers. The North Polar ice cap is the same size
      geographically -- doesn't look quite the same size -- but it is exactly the same size as the United States, minus an
      area roughly equal to the state of Arizona. The amount that disappeared in 2005 was equivalent to everything
      east of the Mississippi. The extra amount that disappeared last fall was equivalent to this much. It comes back in
      the winter, but not as permanent ice, as thin ice -- vulnerable. The amount remaining could be completely gone
      in summer in as little as five years. That puts a lot of pressure on Greenland. Already, around the Arctic Circle --
      this is a famous village in Alaska. This is a town in Newfoundland. Antarctica. Latest studies from NASA. The
      amount of a moderate-to-severe snow melting of an area equivalent to the size of California.


             "They were the best of times, they were the worst of times": the most famous opening sentence in English
      literature.  I  want  to  share  briefly  a  tale  of  two  planets.  Earth  and  Venus  are  exactly  the  same  size.  Earth's
      diameter is about 400 kilometers larger, but essentially the same size. They have exactly the same amount of
      carbon. But the difference is, on Earth, most of the carbon has been leeched over time out of the atmosphere,
      deposited in the ground as coal, oil, natural gas, etc. On Venus, most of it is in the atmosphere. The difference is
      that our temperature is 59 degrees on average. On Venus, it's 855. This is relevant to our current strategy of
      taking  as  much  carbon  out of  the  ground  as  quickly  as  possible,  and  putting  it  into the  atmosphere. It's  not
      because Venus is slightly closer to the Sun. It's three times hotter than Mercury, which is right next to the Sun.
      Now, briefly, here's an image you've seen, as one of the only old images, but I show it because I want to briefly
      give you CSI: Climate.


             The  global  scientific  community  says:  man-made  global  warming  pollution,  put  into the  atmosphere,
      thickening this, is trapping more of the outgoing infrared. You all know that. At the last IPCC summary, the
      scientists wanted to say, "How certain are you?" They wanted to answer that "99 percent." The Chinese objected,
      and so the compromise was "more than 90 percent." Now, the skeptics say, "Oh, wait a minute, this could be
      variations in this energy coming in from the sun." If that were true, the stratosphere would be heated as well as
      the lower atmosphere, if it's more coming in.  If it's more being trapped on the way out, then you would expect it
      to be warmer here and cooler here. Here is the lower atmosphere. Here's the stratosphere: cooler. CSI: Climate.

             Now,  here's  the  good  news.  Sixty-eight  percent  of  Americans  now  believe  that  human  activity  is
      responsible  for global warming. Sixty-nine percent believe that the Earth  is  heating up  in a significant way.
      There has been progress, but here is the key: when given a list of challenges to confront, global warming is still
      listed at near the bottom. What is missing is a sense of urgency. If you agree with the factual analysis, but you
      don't feel the sense of urgency, where does that leave you? Well, the Alliance for Climate Protection, which I
      head in conjunction with Current TV -- who did this pro-bono -- did a worldwide contest to do commercials on
      how to communicate this. This is the winner.

             NBC -- I'll show all of the networks here -- the top journalists for NBC asked 956 questions in 2007 of
      the  presidential  candidates:  two  of  them  were  about  the  climate  crisis.  ABC:  844  questions,  two  about  the
      climate  crisis.  Fox:  two.  CNN:  two.  CBS:  zero.  From  laughs  to  tears  --  this  is  one  of  the  older  tobacco
                                                           128
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134