Page 214 - 4188
P. 214

212

         priorities of the other side. They assume a conflict of interests between
         the parties rather than engaging in a rational pursuit. This is just one of
         many errors in negotiator judgment that, left unrecognized, can thwart a
         negotiation at the start.
















                 Win/Win vs. Win/Lose
                 Distributive  negotiation,  or  traditional  negotiation,  is  the  style

         which  is  familiar  to  most  people.  In  this  model  the  objective  is  to
         convince the other side that s/he wants what you have to offer more than
         want what s/he has to offer. Negotiation means hard, tough bargaining.
         It  is  a  win/lose  model  whose  underlying  assumption  is  the  fixed  pie.

         That is every time you take a slice there is that much left for the other
         side. But that is only true, if there is only one issue to decide.
                 Most people would consider the price for the sale of some object

         like  a  piece  of  art  as  one  example.  However,  is  there  truly  only  one
         issue?  Is  it  possible  that the buyer  would  pay  more  if  terms  could be
         arranged  or  a  payment  plan,  so  s/he  wasn't  laying  out  the  full  price
         immediately?  Would  the  seller  take  less  if  the  buyer  offered cash?  Is

         delivery  an  issue  that  is  important  to  one  side?  Does  timing  have  an
         impact? Are there intangibles that are important to a side?
                 Whenever  there  is  more  than  one  issue  to  negotiate  there  is  the

         potential  for  integrative  negotiation.  Differences  in  the  parties'
         preferences  make  mutual  gains  possible.  Integrative  negotiation  or
         win/win  focuses  on  the  parties  working  together  collaboratively  to

         produce an agreement that provides gain for each side. That each side
         does better due to having engaged in the negotiation process than s/he
         would have done on their own. See All Things BATNA.

                 This  win/win  approach  is  also  called Principled  Negotiation  or
         Mutual Gains Bargaining and was first outlined in the groundbreaking
         book, Getting to Yes, by Roger Fisher and William Ury in the 1970's. If
         you read no other book on negotiation read this one. You can click on its

         link for more information. It is ground breaking because it laid out the
         steps negotiators need to follow to apply the win/win approach.
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219