Page 25 - 4153
P. 25

René  Descartes  turned  out  to  be  the  founder  of  the  different
               methodological  program.  In  his  works  “Rules  for  the  Direction  of  the
               Mind” and “Discourse on the Method” he formulated rationalistic and

               deductive  approach  to  cognition  and  proved,  that  absolutely  authentic
               axioms of knowledge are embodied by the mind (intellect). John Locke,
               who  criticizes  the  doctrines  of  Descartes  for  his  ideas,  considers  the

               experience, which is mediated by the activity of our organs of sensation,
               to be the main source of our cognition.
                      The  most  prominent  representatives  of  the  18th    century  in  the
               sphere  of  searching  the  new  paradigm  of  thinking  were  Sh.  Lamerti

               (1709-1751),  D.  Diderot  (1713-1784),  K.  Helvecij  (1715-1771),  P.
               Holbach  (1723-1789).  All  these  thinkers  were  much  more  successive
               materialists than their predecessors in the 17th century. Giving up such

               compromise forms as deism and panteism, they criticized the subjective
               idealism  and  stuck  to  the  position  of  sensualism.  The  main  slogan  of
               these  scientists  was  the  statement:  “A  human  being  is  the  product  of
               outer  circumstances”,  that  leads  to  the  ideas  of  the  necessity  for

               changing  the  social  conditions  in  the  field  of  freedom  and  mind.  It’s
               known  that  French  materialists  didn’t  only  propagated  the
               Enlightenment and free-thinking, but spread the scientific views of that

               time.  Well,  with  the  assistance  of  Diderot  “Encyclopedia”  and  some
               similar  books  were  first  published,  and  Holbach  created  “Christianity
               Unmasked” and “Pocket theology”.

                      G.  Lamerti  (1709  –  1751)  formed  his understanding  of  a human
               being on the basis of mechanical approach, according to which a human
               body  appears  to  be  a  machine,  which  itself  makes  it  move,  it`s  alive

               personification  of  continuous  movement.  The  students  should  analyze
               the  differences  between  a  human  being  and  an  animal,  which  are
               underlined  by  Lamerti,  give  their  own  estimation  of  the  statements,
               described in the treatise “A man is a machine”.

                      K.  Gelvezij  (1715  –  1777)  left  the  example  of  recommendations
               concerning  the  social  and  political  analysis  of  human  behavior.
               According  to  the  principle  of  subordination  to  “the  law  of  interests”,

               natural physical needs (hunger and physical pain) and passion (as self –
               esteem)  can  be  understood  as  human  behavior.  Studying  the  treatise
               “About  a human  being”  it  should be  taken  into  consideration that the
               desire to achieve the coordination between individual and state became

               very important in modern philosophy. In this case Gelvezij idealizes the
               interests of bourgeoisie, the form of a state as a republic and its citizens




                                                             25
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30