Page 11 - 6689
P. 11

10

                                                  SPEECH  ACT  VERBS

                    As Wierzbicka points out, our life consists "to a phenomenal extent of speech acts.
              From morning to night, we ask, answer, quarrel, argue, promise, boast, scold, complain,
              nag, praise, thank, confide, reproach, hint… Moreover, from morning to night, we seek to
              interpret what other people are saying, i.e. what kind of speech acts they are performing.
              Virtually  every  time  someone  opens  his  or  her  mouth  in  our  presence,  we  seek  to
              categorize their utterance as this or that kind of speech act. Was this a threat? Or just a
              warning? Was this a suggestion or rather a request? Was this a criticism or just a casual
              remark? Was this a hint?" (Wierzbicka 1987:3).
                    Speech act words are really extremely important in the world of human action and
              interaction. The set of speech act verbs reflects a certain interpretation of this world. To
              understand  an  English-speaking  society  and  to  have  access  to  its  culture  one  has  to
              understand this interpretation. There are kinds of speech acts for which English has no
              names. But the categories for which english does provide names are evidently particularly
              important.  They  shape  their  perception  of  human  attitudes  and  human  relations.  They
              reflect  their  perceptions and  they  organize them. It is crucially important  to understand
              what these "names" mean.
                     The primary function of speech act verbs consists in interpreting people's speech
              acts,  not  in  performing  speech  acts.  In  normal  interaction,  we  don't  need  speech  act
              verbs to make clear the nature of the speech acts which we wish to perform. When we
              perform speech acts, we express, directly, first person attitudes. When we interpret other
              people's  speech  acts,  we  attribute  to  them  indirectly,  certain  first  person  attitudes.  In
              explicating  speech  act  verbs  in  a  first  person  format  we  are  modelling  the  attitudes
              conveyed  in  first  person  expressions  (I/we  warn  you)  or  attributed  to  the  speakers,
              rightly or wrongly, in the third person reports.
                     All illocutionary verbs indispensibly  possess two semes:
              1.  the seme of locution (speaking) which consists ofthe seme of the utterance act and
                  the seme of propositional act (Searle 1969:23)
              2.  the seme of illocution.
                  There are also delocutionary verbs characterizing peculiarity of speaking itself: to bawl
              for smth., to whisper, to shout, etc.
                     Many  speech  act  verbs  can  be  used  performatively,  i.e.  when  used  in  the  first
              person, present tense, they indicate the nature (illocutionary force) of the utterance.

                                    EXPLICIT AND NONEXPLICIT  ILLOCUTIONARY  ACTS.
                                                          IFID

                     One of Austin’s important insights was that the most obvious device for indicating
              the  illocutionary  force  (the  Illocutionary  Force  Indicating  Device,  or  IFID)  is  an
              expression of the type
                            [I (Vp) you that...]
              where a verb explicitly names the illocutionary act being performed.
              Eg.:
                 1.  I warn you to stop cheating.
                 2.  May I inquire where you got those stolen goods?
                 3.  Your presence is requested
                 4.  Our order is hereby cancelled.
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16