Page 8 - 6689
P. 8

7

                via words. As the examples illustrate, the speaker must have a special institutional role
                and have authority, in a specific context, to perform a declaration appropriately.
                     Eg.:  a.. Referee: You’re out.
                              b. I announce the meeting open.
                              c.  Priest: I now pronounce you husband and wife.
                              d.  I name this ship King Edward.
                     Major functions of speech acts, given by Searle,  can be subdivided into a number
              of  subfunctions.  For  example,  applying  speech  act  research,  the  Council  of  Europe
              created a “notional-functional syllabus’ (van Ek 1976), identifying the following functions:
              1. Exchange of factual information: representatives imparting / seeking factual information
                  identify, ask, report, say, think
              2. Exchange of intellectual information: representatives stating whether you/ ask if others
                agree, disagree, remember, forget, consider possible/ logical/certain/uncertain/ obliged;
                ask or give permission; accept or decline an offer/ invitation
              3. Exchange of emotional attitudes: expressives to express your own/question others’
                surprise, hope, disappointment; preference; gratitude, sympathy; intention; want; desire
              4. Exchange of moral attitudes: expressives to express or request
                apology/ forgiveness; approval/ disapproval; appreciation; regret; indifference
              5. Suasion: directive
                Suggest; request; invite; instruct; advise; warn; offer
              6. Socializing: directives /expressives
                greet; take leave; introduce; attract attention; propose a toast; congratulate…
                     Halliday’s  (1975,  1976)  classification  of  functions  was  developed  for  elementary
              school classroom:
              1. Instrumental
              2. Regulatory
              3. Interactional
              4. Personal
              5. Heuristic
              6. Imaginative
              7. Informative
                     There  are  several  other  well-known  typologies  that  classify  functions  and
              subfunctions  of  illocutionary  speech  acts.  Their  authors  are  R.  Ohmann,  K.Bach  and
              R.Harnish., J.D.McCawley, Vendler, Wierzbicka.

                                                  FELICITY  CONDITIONS

                    From the very beginning, Austin realized that context was an essential factor in the
              valid  performance  of  an  illocutionary  act.  He  noted  that  the  circumstances  and  the
              participants must be appropriate; the act must be executed completely and correctly by all
              participants;  the  participants  must  have  the  appropriate  intentions.  Austin  called  these
              certain expected or appropriate circumstances felicity conditions for the performance of
              a speech act to be recognized as intended.
                    For some clear cases, such utterances I declare the ceremony open or I name this
              ship Alexander  the performance will be infelicitous (inappropriate) if the speaker is not a
              specific  person  in  a  special  context  (in  these  cases,  a  person  authorized  to  open  the
              ceremony or name the ship). In everyday contexts among ordinary people, there are also
              preconditions on speech acts.
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13