Page 220 - 6484
P. 220

financial sense. Motorola spun off Iridium as a separate company in 1991. It took
               researchers 15 years to develop the product from idea to market release. However, in
               the 1990s, the landscape for cell phone technology was dramatically different from
               the 1980s, and  the widespread  cell phone  coverage  around the  world  eliminated  a

               large base of the projected customer base for Iridium. Had they been paying attention
               to  these  developments,  the  decision  makers  would  probably  have  abandoned  the
               project at some point in the early 1990s. Instead, they released the Iridium phone to
               the market in 1998. The phone cost $3,000 and it was literally the size of a brick.
               Moreover, it was not possible to use the phone in moving cars or inside buildings!
               Not  surprisingly,  the  launch  was  a  failure  and  Iridium  filed  for  bankruptcy  in
                      [5]
               1999.   The  company  was  ultimately  purchased  for  $25  million  by  a  group  of
               investors (whereas it cost the company $5 billion to develop its product), scaled down
               its  operations,  and  modified  it  for  use  by  the  Department  of  Defense  to  connect
               soldiers in remote areas not served by landlines or cell phones.
                      Why does escalation of commitment occur? There may be many reasons, but
               two are particularly important. First, decision makers may not want to admit that they
               were  wrong.  This  may  be  because  of  personal  pride  or  being  afraid  of  the
               consequences of such an admission. Second, decision makers may incorrectly believe
               that spending more time and energy might somehow help them recover their losses.
               Effective decision makers avoid escalation of commitment by distinguishing between
               when  persistence  may  actually  pay  off  versus  when  persistence  might  mean
               escalation of commitment. To avoid escalation of commitment, you might consider
               having strict turning back points. For example, you might determine up front that you
               will not spend more than $500 trying to repair the car and will sell the car when you
               reach that point. You might also consider assigning separate decision makers for the
               initial buying and subsequent selling decisions. Periodical evaluations of an initially
               sound decision to see whether the decision still makes sense is also another way of
               preventing escalation of commitment. This becomes particularly important in projects
               such as the Iridium  where the initial decision is not immediately implemented but
               instead needs to go through a lengthy development process. In such cases, it becomes
               important to assess the soundness of the initial decision periodically in the face of
               changing  market  conditions.  Finally,  creating  an  organizational  climate  where
               individuals do not fear admitting that their initial decision no longer makes economic
               sense would go a long way in preventing escalation of commitment, as it could lower
                                                                   [6]
               the regret the decision maker may experience.
                      Motorola released the Iridium phone to  the market in 1998. The phone cost
               $3,000  and  was  literally  the  size  of  a  brick.  This  phone  now  resides  at  the
               Smithsonian Air and Space Museum in Dulles, Virginia.
                      So far we have focused on how individuals make decisions and how to avoid
               decision traps. Next we shift our focus to the group level. There are many similarities
               and many differences between individual and group decision making. There are many
               factors  that  influence  group  dynamics  and  also  affect  the  group  decision-making
               process. We will discuss some of them in the next section.






                                                              220
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225