Page 139 - 6484
P. 139

Source: Based on Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial attitudes
               and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin; Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation.
               New York: Wiley.
                      The first question is whether the person believes that high levels of effort will
               lead to desired outcomes. This perception is labeled as expectancy. For example, do
               you believe that the effort you put forth in a class is related to learning worthwhile
               material  and  receiving  a  good  grade?  If  you  do,  you  are  more  likely  to  put  forth
               effort.
                      The  second  question  is  the  degree  to  which  the  person  believes  that

               performance  is  related  to  secondary  outcomes  such  as  rewards.  This  perception  is
               labeled  asinstrumentality.  For  example,  do  you  believe  that  passing  the  class  is
               related  to  rewards  such  as  getting  a  better  job,  or  gaining  approval  from  your
               instructor, from your friends, or parents? If you do, you are more likely to put forth
               effort.
                      Finally, individuals are also concerned about the value of the rewards awaiting
               them as a result of performance. The anticipated satisfaction that will result from an
               outcome  is  labeled  as valence.  For  example,  do  you  value  getting  a  better  job  or
               gaining  approval  from  your  instructor,  friends,  or  parents?  If  these  outcomes  are
               desirable to you, you are more likely to put forth effort.
                      As  a  manager,  how  can  you  influence  these  perceptions  to  motivate
               employees?  In  fact,  managers  can  influence  all  three  perceptions.     [19]  To  influence
               their  expectancy  perceptions,  managers  may  train  their  employees,  or  hire  people
               who  are  qualified  for  the  jobs  in  question.  Low  expectancy  may  also  be  due  to
               employees  feeling  that  something  other  than  effort  predicts  performance,  such  as
               political  behaviors  on  the  part  of  employees.  In  this  case,  clearing  the  way  to
               performance and creating an environment in which employees do not feel blocked
               will be helpful. The first step in influencing instrumentality  is  to  connect pay  and
               other  rewards  to  performance  using  bonuses,  award  systems,  and  merit  pay.
               Publicizing  any  contests  or  award  programs  is  helpful  in  bringing  rewards  to  the
               awareness of employees. It is also important to highlight that performance and not
               something else is being rewarded. For example, if a company has an employee-of-
               the-month award that is rotated among employees, employees are unlikely to believe
               that performance is being rewarded. In the name of being egalitarian, such a reward
               system  may  actually  hamper  the  motivation  of  highest  performing  employees  by
               eroding instrumentality. Finally, to influence valence, managers will need to find out
               what their employees value. This can be done by talking to employees, or surveying
               them about what rewards they find valuable.

                                                              139
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144