Page 135 - 6484
P. 135

Specifically,  we  compare  our  inputs  and  outputs  with  someone  else’s  inputs  and
               outputs.  We  perceive  fairness  if  we  believe  that  the  input-to-output  ratio  we  are
               bringing into the situation is similar to the input/output ratio of a comparison person,
               or a referent. Perceptions of inequity create tension within us and drive us to action

               that will reduce perceived inequity. This process is illustrated in the Equity Formula.
                      Figure 14.9 The Equity Formula


















                      Source:  Based  on  Adams,  J.  S.  (1965).  Inequity  in  social  exchange.  In  L.
               Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology(Vol. 2, pp. 267–299).
               New York: Academic Press.
                      What Are Inputs and Outputs?
                      Inputs  are  the  contributions  the  person  feels  he  or  she  is  making  to  the
               environment. In the previous example, the hard work Marie was providing, loyalty to
               the  organization,  the  number  of  months  she  has  worked  there,  level  of  education,
               training, and her skills may have been relevant inputs. Outputs are the rewards the
               person  feels  he  or  she  is  receiving  from  the  situation.  The  $10  an  hour  Marie  is
               receiving  was  a  salient  output.  There  may  be  other  outputs,  such  as  the  benefits
               received or the treatment one gets from the boss. In the prior example, Marie may
               reason as follows: “I have been working here for six months. I am loyal and I perform
               well (inputs). I am paid $10 an hour for this (outputs). The new guy, Spencer, does
               not  have  any  experience  here  (referent’s  inputs)  but  will  be  paid  $14  (referent’s
               outcomes). This situation is unfair.”
                      We should emphasize that equity perceptions develop as a result of a subjective
               process.  Different  people  may  look  at  exactly  the  same  situation  and  perceive
               different levels of equity. For example, another person may look at the same scenario
               and  decide  that  the  situation  is  fair  because  Spencer  has  computer  skills  and  the
               company is paying extra for these skills.
                      Who Is the Referent?
                      The referent other may be a specific person or an entire category of people. For
               example,  Marie  might  look  at  want  ads  for  entry-level  clerical  workers  and  see
               whether the pay offered is in the $10 per hour range; in this case, the referent other is
               the  category  of  entry-level  clerical  workers,  including  office  assistants,  in  Marie’s
               local area. Referents should be comparable to us—otherwise the comparison is not
               meaningful.  It  would  be  illogical  for  Marie  to  compare  herself  to  the  CEO  of  the
               company, given  the differences  in  the nature  of inputs  and outcomes. Instead, she
               would logically compare herself to those performing similar tasks within the same
               organization or a different organization.

                                                              135
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140