Page 141 - 6205
P. 141
покарання)
to abolish відмінювати, скасовувати
Task 2. Read and translate the text, write down all the unknown
words.
The History of English Law
In the Western world to-day there are countless systems of law, but
broadly speaking, they arise from either of two roots – the Roman Law or
the English Law. The English Common Law is native to Britain, but has
sprung forth in the United States, in Australia, New Zealand and most of
Canada, whereas Scotland, the Continent and South Africa have all taken
strong doses of Roman Law.
It is very curious that the Romans should have left their trace on the
English language and landscape, but failed to affect their law.
The next influence on English Law was the formidable William the
Conqueror (XI century). The English king Henry II (XII century)
influenced the English law greatly. To him England owes the Assizes and
the jury system as a regular mode of trial. In its early form the jury was a
selected body of men who were obliged on oath “to present” for trial all
the people in their district who committed crimes. The jury system became
more firmly established and trial by jury became compulsory.
The Court of Chancery was established under the Statute of
Westminster II (XIII-th century). The Chancellor was at first the King’s
secretary. The Court of Chancery dealt with civil matters in Equity.
Relations between Common Law and Chancery Courts grew worse.
After the Napoleonic Wars a new Common Court of Appeal was
established. Various acts tended to one thing, the fusion of the courts. This
was finally achieved by the Judicature Acts of 1873 and 1875. There was
to be one Supreme Court consisting of the Court of Appeal and the High
Court. For convenience it was divided into three Divisions – Chancery,
Queen’s Bench and Probate, Divorce and Admiralty. The age old struggle
between Law and Equity was put to rest.
The highest court in the land to-day is the House of Lords. In
theory, any peer sitting in the House may take part in an appeal. It is a
custom that only those in the Lords holding high judicial office may do so.
137