Page 220 - 6202
P. 220
When we consider P, ... we find that Q.
• A second problem for the view that P ... is found when we examine Q.
One difference between P and Q is that R; ... we can explain this difference.
In order to explain this difference we look ... at the analysis proposed by F.
The relevant data are shown in [NN], ... where we see that P.
This leads us on to consider what ... will help us to account for P.
Now, with this view of P, ... we posit that Q.
Given this notion of P, ... we can explain the lack of Q.
Another question arises, P; ... to answer this question, we will first turn to Q.
Earlier ... we have posited the existence of P.
In this section ... we have seen that this restriction follows from P.
However, ... we have not yet argued that P.
• Now ... we are faced with the problem of (defining) P.
We ... must now consider the nature of Р/ will now compare P and Q.
We ... put aside for now the question of P.
Here ... we shall group together PP.
We need ... to consider only Р/some other way of distinguishing P from Q.
We can ... now reconstruct Р/ advance the hypothesis that P.
We will … see below that Р/ return to this question below.
...consider each of these items in turn.
• If these observations are correct, as we will assume, ... then Q.
A consequence of this view is that ... we can account for the fact that P.
Thus ... we can posit/ infer/ predict/ conclude that P.
3.1.4. Modalities
• There are three ways ... in which the notion of P may be construed.
There may well be ... some significant relationship between P and Q.
P ... may be discovered to be equivalent to Q/ may be said to belong to Q.
... might already exist in the form of Q/ could be extended to take account of Q.
... should not be confused with Q/ is difficult to study, as it is unpredictable.
• The outcome of such investigations ... should have a bearing on P.
Special stress ... should be laid on P.
A word should be said ... about Q.
Perhaps the best way to come at the issue ... is by asking the question of P.
Three factors appear to be at work ... in determining P.
Two remarks ... are in order/ would be appropriate here.
This discussion has demonstrated that ... one cannot simply say: P.
The question must be asked ... as to what P is intended to represent.
Such analysis/ idea/ view must be rejected ... in favor of P.
We must take care not to misinterpret ... the difficulty of P.
In cases of P ... a detailed investigation of Q is needed.
One thus needs ... a theory about P.
A lot more investigation of P ... needs to be undertaken/ carried out.
These aspects ... need further investigation.
This should receive the attention ... it deserves.
213