Page 219 - 6202
P. 219
Thus far, ... I have been attempting to present P; we now turn to Q.
I have not so far ... discussed P.
Another matter ... that I have not touched on so far in dealing with P is Q.
The properties of P ... that I have just introduced will be further discussed in this
paper within the context of Q.
Such rules are divided up ... into P and Q; the latter I shall present in the analysis
below/ in the next section.
A question I would like to address at this point … is whether P.
Because I am concentrating on P … I shall only give Q.
• I ... use this term as a cover term for various phenomena that involve P.
... portray this state of affairs using the illustration of Р/have no explanation for P
... would like to propose Р/ would not like to sound categorical.
... do not object to this approach/ do not intend to convey that P.
... believe that there are problems with this view.
... find this account inappropriate/ am not in a position to speak about P.
On the whole/ In detail, ... I maintain/ hope/ suggest/ conclude that P.
3.1.2. Indirect reference/comments
• This article analyzes P, ... accounting for its properties
The analysis rests on ... the observation that there are similarities between P and Q
Here it is argued ... that there are similarities also between P and Q.
Here a view of P is assumed ... that is based on the work of F.
Here it will suffice ... to characterize P. Here it is proposed that P.
In order to examine P ... it is essential to have a clear view of Q.
Of particular interest is ... the fact that P. The question arises as to the nature of R
There may (well) be ... some significant relationship between P and Q.
The view outlined above ... raises some questions as to the nature of P.
One added complexity ... presents itself, P.
Two factors ... appear to be at work in determining P.
An immediate problem ... with the view developed thus far is that P.
One reason for … rejecting the idea that P comes from the fact that Q.
• This fact can be accounted for ... by adopting F's constraints against Q.
These constraints ... appear to consist of PP.
This ... is supported by the fact that P.
This analysis accounts neatly ... for the (surprising) fact that P.
With respect to (the nature of) P, ... it is interesting to note that Q/ it is unlike that
Q.
Hence/ Thus, ... it is clear that R.
3.1.3. Cooperating
• Let us ... first consider the data/ ask (address) the question whether P.
...suppose that Р/ analyze the case involving Р/ apply this rule to P.
Let me try ... to present a slightly different picture.
As soon as ... we deal with cases involving P we are confronted with Q.
We can follow ... F in assuming that P.
212