Page 83 - 4188
P. 83

81

                         It  is  also  argued  that  freedom  of  expression  is  crucial  in  any
                  democracy,  because  open  discussions  of  candidates  are  essential  for
                  voters to make informed decisions during elections. It is through speech
                  that people can influence their governments? choice of policies. At the

                  same time public officials are held accountable through criticisms that
                  can pave the way for their replacement.
                         There are suggestions that when citizens refrain from voicing their

                  discontent because they fear retribution, the government can no longer
                  be  responsive  to  them,  thus  it  is  less  accountable  for  its  actions.
                  Therefore,  it  is  often  said  this  is  the  main  reason  why  governments
                  suppress free speech ? to avoid accountability. To make things worse is

                  the situation in my country, Tonga, where government is appointed and
                  holds office at His Majesty?s discretion. I will later refer to the impact of
                  such a political setting on free expression and the media as a case study.

                  Alternatively,  some  believe  that  some  restrictions  on  freedom  of
                  expression may be compatible with democracy or necessary to protect it.
                  [For example, such arguments were used to justify restrictions in support

                  of Nazi ideas in post-war Germany.]
                         Another  rationale  is  that  freedom  of  expression  is  an  essential
                  aspect of personhood and autonomy. That is, ?to engage voluntarily in a

                  speech act is to engage in self-definition or expression. A war protester
                  may  explain  that  when  he  chants  ?stop  this  war  now?  at  a2
                  demonstration, she does so without any expectation that he speech will
                  affect  continuance  of the  war, but  rather  he  participates  and chants in

                  order  to  express  himself  publicly  in  opposition  to  the  war.  This  war
                  protester provides a dramatic illustration of the importance of this self-
                  expressive use of speech, independent of any effective communication

                  to others, for selffulfilment or self-realisation.
                         Another  explanation  is  that  freedom  of  expression  is  integral  to
                  tolerance,  which  some  people  feel  should be  a  basic  value  in  society.
                  This principle involves a special act of carving out one area of social

                  interaction  for  extraordinary  self-restraint,  the  purpose  of  which  is  to
                  develop and demonstrate a social capacity to control feelings evoked by
                  a host of social encounters. The freedom of expression principle is left

                  with the concern of nothing less than helping to shape the intellectual
                  character of the society.
                         Freedom of expression and opinion is a foundation without which

                  many other basic human rights cannot be enjoyed. Allowing people to
                  publicly investigate and report on human rights abuses makes it much
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88