Page 115 - 4187
P. 115

115

                      …  are simply different subcategories of experiential phenomena.
                      …  can be systematized by classifying into R and Q. P
                      …  is classed as a member of Q/ is the unifying concept for Q and R.
                      …  can be interpreted in structural terms/ may be said to belong to Q.
                      …  and Q in some way can be unified/ is a condition which determines the class
                             of Q.
                      …  is a motive for a re-examination of Q/ should be reinterpreted as a system.
               •     At this point, it will be useful to introduce some terminology.
                    Here a new set of terms is offered.
                    We can use the notion/ term P . .. for interpreting this type of interaction.
                    This notion ... is (can/ may) be defined by (with respect to) P.
                      ... is commonly (widely) defined as P.
                    This concept ... provides (helps describe/ can explain) P.
                      ... is appropriate to express the property of P.
                      ... enables one to distinguish P and Q.
                      ... expresses a new way of looking at humans.
               •     This term …
                      …  means/ indicates/ refers to/ distinguishes P from Q/ is used to refer to P.
                      …  is employed here in its general (in Kuhn's) sense/ is reserved for P.
                    This metaphor ...
                      …  places focus on Р/ raises interesting questions.
                      …  introduces the idea of «scripts».
                      …  is usually characterized in terms of P.
                      …  describe the behavior of/ represent conditions of/ are valid in P.
               •     (On further reflection/ On a more general level, it becomes evident that) ...
                    Our data permit two generalizations.
                    This idea can be generalized to apply to P.
                    This generalization ... explains why different species  respond to P in different
                     ways.
                    These properties ... can be elevated to the status of higher principles.
                    Such phenomena ... can be understood as representations.
               •     This/ Our conclusion ... is consistent with what is known about P.
                    Our results/ interpretations  ... agree/ contrast with previously published work.
                    These calculations ... show agreement with experiments/ provide an insight into
                     P.
                    These observations ... are compatible with P
                    These judgments ... correlate with the attitude towards P.
                    Such  representation  ...  does  not  differ  from  earlier  schemes  for  world
                     representation.
               •     Now it should be clear (the fact is clear/ It is none the less clear) that P.
                    It is (would be) accurate to say/ It cannot (can hardly) be denied that P.
                    Certain elements of P are extremely stable.
                    This system is constituted by certain relations.
                    PP … are all alternatives.
                    These rules operate according to certain conventions.
                    These laws hold only in certain situations. In certain cases the converse may be
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120