Page 115 - 4187
P. 115
115
… are simply different subcategories of experiential phenomena.
… can be systematized by classifying into R and Q. P
… is classed as a member of Q/ is the unifying concept for Q and R.
… can be interpreted in structural terms/ may be said to belong to Q.
… and Q in some way can be unified/ is a condition which determines the class
of Q.
… is a motive for a re-examination of Q/ should be reinterpreted as a system.
• At this point, it will be useful to introduce some terminology.
Here a new set of terms is offered.
We can use the notion/ term P . .. for interpreting this type of interaction.
This notion ... is (can/ may) be defined by (with respect to) P.
... is commonly (widely) defined as P.
This concept ... provides (helps describe/ can explain) P.
... is appropriate to express the property of P.
... enables one to distinguish P and Q.
... expresses a new way of looking at humans.
• This term …
… means/ indicates/ refers to/ distinguishes P from Q/ is used to refer to P.
… is employed here in its general (in Kuhn's) sense/ is reserved for P.
This metaphor ...
… places focus on Р/ raises interesting questions.
… introduces the idea of «scripts».
… is usually characterized in terms of P.
… describe the behavior of/ represent conditions of/ are valid in P.
• (On further reflection/ On a more general level, it becomes evident that) ...
Our data permit two generalizations.
This idea can be generalized to apply to P.
This generalization ... explains why different species respond to P in different
ways.
These properties ... can be elevated to the status of higher principles.
Such phenomena ... can be understood as representations.
• This/ Our conclusion ... is consistent with what is known about P.
Our results/ interpretations ... agree/ contrast with previously published work.
These calculations ... show agreement with experiments/ provide an insight into
P.
These observations ... are compatible with P
These judgments ... correlate with the attitude towards P.
Such representation ... does not differ from earlier schemes for world
representation.
• Now it should be clear (the fact is clear/ It is none the less clear) that P.
It is (would be) accurate to say/ It cannot (can hardly) be denied that P.
Certain elements of P are extremely stable.
This system is constituted by certain relations.
PP … are all alternatives.
These rules operate according to certain conventions.
These laws hold only in certain situations. In certain cases the converse may be