Page 120 - 6688
P. 120

120
                                [7] a. Don't touch that!
                                      b. Get out of here!
                     There are, consequently, some social circumstances where using a direct command as
              a bald on record expression is considered appropriate among social equals.
              However, generally speaking, bald on record expressions are associated with speech events
              where the speaker assumes that he or she has power over the other (for example, in military
              con-texts) and can control the other's behavior with words. In every-day interaction between
              social equals, such bald on record behavior would potentially represent a threat to the other's
              face and would generally be avoided. Avoiding a face threatening act is accomplished by face
              saving acts which use positive or negative politeness strategies.

                     Positive and negative politeness.
                     A positive politeness strategy leads the requester to appeal to a common goal, and
              even friendship, via expressions such as those in [8].
                               [8] a. How about letting me use your pen?
                                    b. Hey, buddy, I'd appreciate it if you'd let me use   your pen.
                 These on record expressions do represent a greater risk for the speaker of suffering a refusal
              and may be preceded by some 'get-ting to know you' talk, of the kind presented in [9], designed
              to establish the necessary common ground for this strategy.
                       [9] Hi. How's it going? Okay if I sit here? We must be inter-             ested in the same
              crazy stuff. You take a lot of notes too, huh? Say,   do me a big favor and let me use one of
              your pens.

                     However,  in  most  English-speaking  contexts,  a  face  saving  act  is  more  commonly
              performed via a negative politeness strategy. The
              most typical form used is a question containing a modal verb such as [10a. ].
                               [10] a. Could you lend me a pen?
                               b. I'm sorry to bother you, but can I ask you for a pen or
              something?
                               c. I know you're busy, but might I ask you if—em—if you happen to have an extra
              pen that I could, you know-eh-maybe borrow?
                     Using this strategy also results in forms which contain expres-sions of apology for the
              imposition,  of  the  type  shown  in  [10b.  ].  More  elaborate  negative  politeness  work  can
              sometimes be heard in extended talk, often with hesitations, similar to that shown in [10c. ].
              It is worth noting that negative politeness is typically expressed via questions, even questions
              that seem to ask for permission to ask a question (for example, 'Might I ask... ?') as in [10с. ].
              On the surface, such questions present an opportunity for the other to answer in the negative
              to the question without the same refusal effect of responding with a negative to a direct, bald on
              record imperative. (This distinction is an important motivation for the distinction between direct
              and indirect speech acts, discussed already. )
                     Even  more  relevant  for  our  concern  with  the  pragmatics  of  lan-guage  in  use,  the
              availability of the bald on record form, as well as off record forms, means that the use of a face-
              saving on record form represents a significant choice. The choice of a type of expression that is
              less direct, potentially less clear, generally longer, and with a more complex structure means
              that the speaker is making a greater effort, in terms of concern for face (i. e. po-liteness), than
              is needed simply to get the basic message across efficiently.
                     Strategies
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124