Page 132 - 6484
P. 132

In  contrast, motivators are  factors  that  are  intrinsic  to  the  job,  such  as
               achievement, recognition, interesting work, increased responsibilities, advancement,
               and  growth  opportunities.  According  to  Herzberg’s  research,  motivators  are  the
               conditions that truly encourage employees to try harder.

                      Figure 14.7 Two-Factor Theory of Motivation

















                      Source:  Based  on  Herzberg,  F.,  Mausner,  B.,  &  Snyderman,  B.  (1959). The
               motivation to work. New York: Wiley; Herzberg, F. (1965). The motivation to work
               among Finnish supervisors. Personnel Psychology, 18, 393–402.
                      Herzberg’s research, which is summarized in the figure above, has received its
                                      [5]
               share  of  criticism.   One  criticism  relates  to  the  classification  of  the  factors  as
               hygiene or motivator. For example, pay is viewed as a hygiene factor. However, pay
               is  not  necessarily  a  contextual  factor  and  may  have  symbolic  value  by  showing
               employees  that  they  are  being  recognized  for  their  contributions  as  well  as
               communicating  to  them  that  they  are  advancing  within  the  company.  Similarly,
               quality  of  supervision  or  relationships  employees  form  with  their  supervisors  may
               determine whether they are assigned interesting work, whether they are recognized
               for  their  potential,  and  whether  they  take  on  more  responsibilities.  Despite  its
               limitations, the two-factor theory can be a valuable aid to managers because it points
               out that improving the environment in which the job is performed goes only so far in

               motivating employees.
                      Acquired Needs Theory
                      Among  the  need-based  approaches  to  motivation,  Douglas  McClelland’s
               acquired needs theory is the one that has received the greatest amount of support.
               According to this theory, individuals acquire three types of needs as a result of their
               life experiences. These needs are need for achievement, need for affiliation, and need
               for power. All individuals possess a combination of these needs.
                      Those  who  have  high need for achievement have  a  strong  need  to  be
               successful. A worker who derives great satisfaction from meeting deadlines, coming
               up with brilliant ideas, and planning his or her next career move may be high in need
               for  achievement.  Individuals  high  on  need  for  achievement  are  well  suited  to
               positions  such  as  sales  where  there  are  explicit  goals,  feedback  is  immediately
                                                                      [6]
               available, and their effort often leads to success.   Because of their success in lower-
               level  jobs,  those  in  high  need  for  achievement  are  often  promoted  to  higher-level
                           [7]
               positions.   However, a high need for achievement has important disadvantages in
               management. Management involves getting work done by motivating others. When a
               salesperson  is  promoted  to  be  a  sales  manager,  the  job  description  changes  from


                                                              132
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137