Page 227 - 6421
P. 227

There are two kinds of negligence as one of the forms of guilt:
                  self-confidence and negligence.
                         Self-assumption  assumes  that  a  person  foresees  socially
                  dangerous consequences of his/her behaviour, but foolishly expects to

                  avoid them.
                         Negligence  assumes  that  a  person  does  not  foresee  socially
                  dangerous consequences of his/her actions, but may and must foresee

                  them. The negligence points out, first of all, to the irresponsible and
                  disrespectful attitude of the person to fulfilling his/her obligations, to
                  the interests of society and another person (persons).
                         - offenses are carried out by people who are delict capable, that

                  is, who are able to control their will and their behaviour, to report in
                  their actions, to be aware of their wrongdoing and to be responsible
                  for their consequences.

                         Delict  capability  is  defined  in  laws  and  other  normative-legal
                  acts. Delicts capable are all people who have reached a certain age.
                         - The signs of the offense include the presence of harm caused to

                  a person or an organization by another person or organization and the
                  existence  of  a  causal  link  between  the  wrongful  act  and  the  harm
                  done.

                         The  harm  caused  has  two  aspects  –  legal  and  factual.  The
                  legal part is that the subjective rights of the participants in the legal
                  relations are violated, or such conditions are created that impede the
                  performance of legal obligations by legal subjects. The factual part of

                  the offense consists of inflicting a participant of the legal relationship
                  the material or moral damage.
                         When we are talking about such a feature of an offense, as the

                  presence of a causal link between the wrongful act and the harm done,
                  then,  firstly,  it  is  a  straightforward,  and  not  some  other  connection.
                  Harmful  consequences  should  be  a  direct  result  of  violation  of  the
                  existing legislation. No indirect links between them are allowed; and

                  secondly,  the  causal  connection  should  not  be  accidental,  but  quite
                  logical, which caused the onset of harmful consequences.
                         All signs of the offense are summarized in the concept of "body

                  of a crime", which is developed by law, and groups and describes the
                  features  according  to  the  scheme:  object,  subject,  objective  and
                  subjective aspects of the offense.






                                                              227
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232