Page 49 - 6203

organization of presentation of the material. Sections of these "monographs" are
mostly separate pieces of rough laboratory or archival material, craply "sewn" with

logically unmotivated bridges or indentations. The explanation of this widespread
phenomenon in our science lies in several aspects: the inability of the author to

think logically, inadequate study of the problem due to the lack of completeness of
the collected empirical material, the lack of reasonableness of the work plan. It is

from the analysis of the work plan, more precisely, the internal construction of its

constituent parts - introductory, main and final - begins studying and improving the

structure of the future scientific publication. You can improve this structure by:

systematizing the collected material; compliance with approximately the same ratio

of the volume of structural components of the text (paragraphs, sections, parts); a

clear separation of these components of the main and secondary; strict logic of

presentation; writing of serious generalizations; development of independent

conclusions; Identify and eliminate repetitions, paragraphs, or entire pages written

"not by subject."

3) The content aspect. The harmonious combination of the form and content of

any, especially scientific, is particularly relevant. It is important in the beginning to

show a clear understanding of the existing methods in science presented in science

for the disclosure of the material: inductive (from individual to general); deductive

(in the opposite direction, from the general,); logical (so-called sequential division

of material into semantic fragments); historical (analysis of events and events in a

strictly chronological sequence). During writing works, scientists use more

sophisticated methods: the method of ascending from the abstract to the concrete; a

spiral method that involves the gradual development of thought by repeating it

every time at a more general level. Free "capture" of these methods during the

writing of texts, which guarantees logic, consistency and proof of presentation, will

always be alarming the author during inevitable contractions. The laconic and

conciseness of paragraphs or entire sections will be ensured not by throwing out

some important component in the chain of evidence, but primarily due to the

"squeezing of water", that is, verbiage, stretchiness, lengthy sentences, repetition,