Page 192 - 6202

 This is insufficient ... even for a formal model of human cognition.
 F's ideas ... remain challenging even for the modern lexicographer.
•  Recent work ... shows just how systematic such phenomena can be.
 This principle ... is really just an extension of the notion of preference.
 We shall adopt ... the scheme of just four categories.
 Recognizing P ... poses just the same problems as Q.
 Cohesion ... is not just another name for discourse structure.
 These things ... are just pushed a bit further into the background.
•  P ... is relevant only when/ is only suited for Q/remains (requires) only Q.
... applies properly (is applicable) only to Q/ is only apparent.
... can only be partial.
 The only sure way, ... of doing this is P.
 There is only ... a partial overlap between P and Q.
 This algorithm ... is quite unacceptable/ appropriate (to my approach).
... is quite adequate for Р/ distinct from P.
... is based quite directly on Р/ operates quite counter-intuitively.
 P and Q ... are related but quite distinct topics/ were found quite stable.
 We can do that ... quite simply.
•  There is ... a very wide variety of Р/ a very straightforward way of establishing
P.
 This is part ... of a very general restriction on P.
 It is very easy ... to present data in a misleading way.
 F's book ... is very well done in every respect.
... may very well stand out as Q/ is very informative.
 Very little of this research ... permits unequivocal cause-effect statements.
2.1.7. Emphatic deictics

•  This is beyond ... our interests/ subject matter/ the scope of the article.
 Here is ... an example/ a more challenging proof, Р/ my definition: Q.
 Here ... there has been most need to rethink issues.
 There are … two crucial questions here, P and Q.
•  My own opinion is that P. In such cases scientists must rely on their own
imagination.
 We need a better understanding ... of our own solar system formation.
 These methods/ approaches ... are peculiar to pragmatics itself.
... are inherent in the perspective itself.
 The definition ... will not by itself provide us with P.
 Distinguishing P from Q ... itself can be difficult.
 This claim ... is itself a contradiction/ may itself be very fruitful.
 The author of [NN], F ... himself voiced similar opinions/ manifests this view
himself.

•  No P ... is ever likely to emerge without Q.
 Ever since its beginnings, ... this field has been divided into Q and P.
 This field ... will never reach a theoretical status.
 This does not mean that ... there can never be any uncertainty.

185