Page 196 - 6202
P. 196

then Q.
                    As it has already been stated above, ... P may be manifested in terms of Q.
                    It is not overstating the case to say/ In conclusion, it may be said ... that P (is
                     similar to Q).

                      2.2.6. Arguing by negation (Impersonal constructions)

               •     It is beyond the scope of this paper ... to develop these matters further.
                    It is not my purpose/ the purpose of this article ... to delve into P.
                    It is doubtful/ seems unlikely ... that this theory will capture P.
                    It is in principle impossible/ It would not be productive ... to reduce P to Q.
               •     It is (was not) accident/It is thus not surprising/It needs no argument   ... that P.
                    It is misleading/ nonsensical/ pointless/ not correct/ an error ... to focus only on
                     P.
                    It would not be adequate         ... to regard/ consider P as Q.
                    It cannot/ can .hardly be denied ... that P is true.

                      2.2.7. Arguing by inversion (Emphatic impersonal constructions)

               •     It is here ... that F's major contribution to the field as a whole lies.
                    It is in this area of inquiry ... that much of the terminology originates.
                    It is just in the threshold region ... where these effects are most important.
               •     It is P ... which is characteristic of Q.
                    It is the rate of P ... that will be most troublesome.
                    It is one of the basic principles of Q ... that P.
                    It is my firm belief ... that P is erroneous.
                    It does not have to be the case ... that P.
                    It is exactly the case ... with P.
                    It is precisely this that distinguishes ... P and Q.
                    It is our aim      ... to detect/ find P.
                    It will require innovation        ... to protect the environment.
                    It is the job of scientists ... to provide P.
                    It is indeed as a tool of social interaction ... that speech most clearly confers an
                     evolutionary advantage on man.

                     2.3. Parenthesis; Appositive emphatic patterns accounting for
                     2.3.1. (Parenthesis accounting for) Conditions

               •     In view of Р/ In this framework/ In our current conception/ In a broad sense, ...
                     R.
                    In  the  light  of  my  proposed  treatment  of  P,  ...  it  would  seem  that  Q.
                     In proposals I am making in this article, ... P (is similar to Q).
                    Неге/ In this connection/ In response to P (this) ... it will be shown that P.
                    In particular/ In detail, ... we shall see that this is not sufficient.
               •     In discussing/ surveying P, ... it is better to use the term Q/ we want to relate R
                     to Q.
                    In practice, ... P is common/ is somewhat uncommon.
                    In biology, ... we are entitled to use functional explanations.

                                                                                                      189
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201