Page 225 - 4188
P. 225

223

                  negotiators create value and reduce contentious behavior, whereas other-
                  directed anger has the opposite effect (for a review, see Barry, Fulmer,
                  & Van Kleef, 2004). Yet, several questions regarding the emotional side
                  of negotiation are still unanswered. We identify a few of these questions

                  in the remainder of the chapter.
                         Morris  and  Keltner  (2000)  proposed  two  different  approaches  to
                  integrating emotion into negotiation. The first is the affect and cognition

                  perspective, which focuses on the intrapersonal processes that emotions
                  evoke  (e.g.,  how  does  a  focal  negotiator  act  under  the  influence  of  a
                  particular  emotion?).  The  second  is  the  social-functional  perspective,
                  which  focuses  on  the  interpersonal  processes  that  emotions  facilitate

                  (e.g., how does a focal negotiator influence the dyad as a whole under
                  the  influence  of  a  particular  emotion?).  Thus,  while  intrapersonal
                  research focuses on the effects that emotions experienced by a negotiator

                  have on his/her behavior, interpersonal research focuses on the effects
                  that the negotiator’s emotions have on his/her counterpart.
                         In this chapter, we  focus exclusively on the affect and cognition

                  perspective, and examine how the felt emotions of the focal negotiator
                  increase  or  reduce  the  use  of  deception.  However,  we  see  research
                  following  the  social-functional  perspective  to  be  crucial  in  the

                  understanding of negotiators’ behavior at the bargaining table. We hope
                  that future work will dedicate research attention to this important line of
                  investigation.


                      ASSIGNMENTS
                  1.  Explain the main idea of the text.
                  2.  Make in pairs dialogues using this text.

                  3.  What does the term ‘deception in negotiations’ mean?
                  4.  Find a paragraph where this term used and translate it.
                  5.  Try to make your own sentences using this expression.
                  6.  Make a conclusion to this article using this expression.

                  7.  If you have a possibility to deceive in negotiations, would you?
                  8.  How does the mood affect negotiations?
                  9.  Have you ever had an experience of negotiations?

                  10.  Summarize the text.
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230