Page 87 - 4187
P. 87

87


                      GUIDELINES FOR LANGUAGE USAGE IN RESEARCH
               WRITING

                      Voice and Self-Reference
                      In  the  past,  scientific  writers  used  the  passive  voice  almost

               exclusively  and  referred  to  themselves  in  the  third  person:  “This
               experiment was designed by the authors to test ...” This practice produces
               lifeless prose and is no longer the norm. Use the active voice unless style
               or  content  dictates  otherwise;  and,  in  general,  keep  self-reference  to  a
               minimum. Remember that you are not the topic of your article. You should

               not refer to yourself as “the author” or “the investigator.” (You may refer
               to “the experimenter” in the method section, however, even if that happens
               to be you; the experimenter is part of the topic under discussion there.) Do
               not refer to yourself as “we” unless there really are two or more authors.
               You may refer to yourself as “I,” but do so sparingly. It tends to distract
               the  reader  from  the  topic,  and  it  is  better  to  remain  in  the  background.
               Leave the reader in the background, too. Do not say, “The reader will find
               it hard to believe that ... “ or “You will be surprised to learn...” (This article

               violates  the  rule  because  you  and  your  prose  are  the  topic.)  You  may,
               however,  refer  to  the  reader  indirectly  in  imperative,  “you-understood”
               sentences: “Consider, first, the results for women.” “Note particularly the
               difference between the means in Table 1.”
                      In some contexts, you can use “we” to refer collectively to yourself

               and your readers: “We can see in Table 1 that most of the tears...”
                      Tense
                      Use  the  past  or  present  perfect  tense  when  reporting  the  previous
               research of others (“Bandura reported...” or “Hardin has reported…”) and
               past tense when reporting how you conducted your study (“Observers were
               posted behind...”) and specific past behaviors of your participants (“Two of
               the men talked...”). Use the present tense for results currently in front of

               the reader (“As Table 2 shows, the negative film is more effective ...”) and
               for conclusions that are more general than the specific results (“Positive
               emotions, then, are more easily expressed when...”).
                      Avoid Language Bias
                      Like  most  publishers,  the  APA  now  has  extensive  guidelines  for
               language that refers to individuals or groups.

                      Research Participants. One distinctive group of people who appear
               in our journal articles are those whom we study. It is no longer considered
               appropriate  to  objectify  them  by  calling  them  subjects.  Instead  use
               descriptive  terms  that  either  identify  them  more  specifically  or  that
               acknowledge their roles as partners in the research process, such as college
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92