Page 44 - 4150
P. 44

ensure that the  measurement process “does produce” correct results.
                           This type of demand also applies to testing and calibration laboratories.
                               The  ISO  10012  norm,  “System  of  management  of  the
                           measurement  –  requirements  for  the  measurement  equipments  and
                           processes” introduces the following demand:
                               If the result of a metrological verification prior to any adjustment
                           or  repair  indicates  that  the  measuring  equipment  did  not  meet  the
                           metrological requirement such that the correctness of the measurement
                           results  may  have  been  compromised,  the  equipment  user  shall
                           determine the potential consequences and take any necessary action.
                           This  can  involve  re-examination  of  product  produced  using
                           measurements  taken  with  the  nonconforming  measuring  equipment.
                           These  measures  can  have  significant  technical  and  financial
                           implications  for  a  firm  or  a  laboratory.  For  firms  there  are  two
                           immediate consequences of this requirement:
                               – the need to have the intervals of calibration of the instruments
                           under control;
                               –  the  need  to  set  up  methods  of  monitoring  the  measuring
                           instruments.
                               The  determination  of  the  calibration  intervals  and  their
                           modification, plus the setting up of the methods of monitoring, make
                           it possible to minimize the risk, or at least to control it.
                               A  selection  of  the  instruments  to  be  monitored  will  have  to  be
                           made when setting up the monitoring methods. Those instruments that
                           are especially critical from an economic point of view or for security
                           reasons should be examined first.
                               The  ISO  10012  international  written  standard  requires  the
                           organization to specify which measurement processes should comply
                           with the measures stated in this international standard. It is advisable
                           to take into account the risks and consequences of not satisfying the
                           metrological  requirements  when  the  limits  within  which  a  standard
                           has to be complied with have been defined.
                               Methods  for  monitoring  the  instruments  in  use  –  general
                           criteria
                               These  methods  should  satisfy  some  criteria  in  order  to  work
                           efficiently  and  be  applicable  when  the  instruments  in  use  are
                           monitored:
                                                           42
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49