Page 204 - 6202

supplementation.
 Though it is held that P, ... we are finding that Q.
 This notion, vague though it is, ... is not invalid.
 This concept dominates most thinking about P, ... even though it is relevant
only at equilibrium.
•  Despite a great deal of effort ...there is still Р/ P has happened.
… it has proved difficult to find evidence for Q.
 Despite usefulness of P, ... as yet it is not used.
 This view will, ... despite criticism, continue to persist.
•  It may be helpful nevertheless ... to summarize P.
 There is no clear way of testing P; ... nevertheless, we can refine Q.
 To assess, ... nevertheless, whether P, we turned to Q.
 Nevertheless it has been advocated ... that P.
 Nevertheless, ... Q constitutes only a necessary, but not a sufficient, test of P.
•  All typologies, regardless of how subtle, ... can destroy the complexities of
experience.
 Quasars must weigh 100 million suns, ... regardless of how long they live.
 Economists argue that unless people ... are charged for P, Q will happen.
 We cannot do P ... unless we are provided with information/ we understand Q.
•  This strategy ... may sound attractive, but its disadvantages are impressive.
 But this definition ... is insufficient (vague)/ would not be productive.
 For further purposes of the present article ... P will not be questioned, but it
should be pointed out that Q.
•  But at best, ... this can only be partial. We can explain P ... if we assume Q.
 If we examine P, ... we shall see that Q. If P is correct, ... then Q.
 Scientists are investigating ... whether P could threaten Q.
 The question of whether P ... is being addressed by scientists.
 It is difficult to determine/ We have no idea ...whether P.
 We aim here to determine ... whether P differs from Q.
 To assess whether P, ... we turned to Q.
 The question is not whether P, ... but rather, Q.
 Disagreement can arise ... as to whether P.
•  These predictions are simplistic, ... hence unrealistic.
 These phenomena are viewed as developments from, ... hence evidence for, P.
 P and Q are two different kinds of mechanism, ... and hence show, different
patterns.
 It is hard to judge Р/ P would be appropriate here ... since Q.
 P casts doubt on the analysis, ... since it is not clear that Q.
 P is the most promising, ... since it was designed to be platform-independent.
 We start by P ... since this is where the problem is well-defined.
 Since P is erroneous/ less evident, ... a new set of terms is offered.
 Since we are assuming/ have assumed that P, ... we can reasonably expect Q.
•  As an example, we shall take/ consider P ... rather than Q.
 This approach is descriptive ... rather than normative.
 We need a relative ... rather than absolute scale here.
197