Page 14 - 4952
P. 14
h
/ g / / g / Lat hostis Germ gast
Rus гость
There are several theories explaining the origin of the
consonant shift. One of the most current is the influence of the
so-called substratum (or underlayer) of a language of a different
type. There is another theory according to which the reasons for
the shift should be found in the peculiarities of the language
itself.
2.2 Verner’s Law
Even after Grimm’s explanation there were several cases
when Grimm‘s Law didn’t work or there was some change
which couldn’t be explained through Grimm’s Law. For
instance, in the position where according to Grimm’s Law the
voiceless sound [?] was expected the voiced [?] appeared (Pater
– Father). Instead of an expected voiceless stop a voiced stop
would appear in some words. These was explained by Сarl
Verner.
Verner’s Law: unstressed vowel + voiceless stop → voiceless
fricative → voiced fricative →voiced stop:
/t/ → /?/ → /?/ → /d/
Example: in the Gr word patěr the voiceless stop /t/ was
preceded by an unstressed root vowel. Under these conditions
the voiceless fricative /?/ which had developed from it in
accordance with the 1st consonant shift became a voiced
fricative /?/ and finally it developed into the voiced stop /d/, i.e.
Gr patěr → OE f?der.
According to Verner’s Law voiceless fricatives /f/, /?/, /h/ which
arose under Grimm’s Law, and also /s/ inherited from PIE,
became voiced between vowels if the preceding vowel was
unstressed; in the absence of these conditions they remained
voiceless. The consonant pairs involved in grammatical
alternation were f/b, ?/d, h/g, hw/w, s/r.
12