Page 118 - 4749
P. 118

from the neutral layer tangential and normal stresses arise that is at
           these points a simplified plane stress occurs. At the point 3, which
           is  at  the  neutral  axis  a  normal  stress  is  absent,  and  a  tangential
           stress obtains maximum magnitude, i.e., the point is in a state of
           pure shear.
             Continued practice of using beams shows that in the most cases
           supporting  strength  at  points  1  and  5  defines  performance
           capability  in  general.  So,  strength  test,  design  calculations  or
           determination  the  allowable  bending  moment  are  carried  out
           provided strength in the most normal stress states
                                     M
                                     z max      .               (6.20)
                                              
                               x max  W
                                        z
             If the beam is loaded by big concentrated forces and its length
           is small, or these forces are applied close to the support, there is a
           need  to  check  the  strength  of  the  beam  at  the  point  3.  Strength
           condition in the largest tangential stresses
                                    Q    S
                                   y max  z      .             (6.21)
                               max
                                      bJ
                                        z
             In calculating  the  beams with  a thin-walled  section (double-T
           profile), and in the case when in a section of the beam at the same
           time the maximum bending moment and the maximum shear force
           arise or their values are close to the maximum, we should check
           the strength of the beam at points 2 and 4 in principal stresses .
           Conditions of strength in principal stresses are recorded depending
           on the chosen strength theory. For example, a third theory

                                    III           ,
                                                   
                                    eqv   1    3

           or considering the formula (3.19), we obtain

                                                                     (6.22)
                                           2
                              III
                                      2
                                     4    .
                                               
                              еqv    x
                                         118
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123