Page 181 - 4188
P. 181

179

                  8.  Why is it appropriate for parents to guide their children’s reading,
                      television viewing, and exposure to media as they see fit?
                  9.  What do you think about censoring books for kids?
                  10. Summarize the text.


                                                            Text 8


                                                 WHY NOT CENSOR?
                                                                                                             40
                                                                                       By Robin Hanson
                         An important kind of regulation is paternalism regarding individual
                  behavior – we often prohibit or require certain choices, and say this is

                  because  people  can  make  mistakes.  The  story  told  is  that  expert
                  regulators can carefully consider the mistakes we are likely to make, and
                  adjust  our  sets  of  available  choices  with  an  eye  to  reducing  those

                  mistakes.  Paternalistic  regulations  now  limit,  for  example,  the
                  investments  you  can  make,  the  food  and drugs  you  can  consume,  the
                  professionals you can employ, the cars you can drive, etc.

                         When  considering  any  particular  regulation,  officials  should
                  consider hoped-for gains from fewer mistakes on the one hand, and then
                  on the other hand subtract expected losses from frustrating preferences,

                  reducing innovation, and enforcement costs. When considering whether
                  to  allow  regulation  in  some  area,  voters  should  also  consider  the
                  possibility of incompetent, corrupt, or partisan regulatiors.
                         While public and elite opinion supports many kinds of regulation,

                  there  also  appears  to  be  a  widely-held  consensus  against  one  kind  of
                  regulation: censorship. While we accept some limits on what kids can
                  hear, and a few limits on extreme adult expressions, the standard view is

                  that  ordinary  adults  should  mostly  be  allowed  to  speak  and  hear
                  whatevever they want.
                         Yet  the  same  human  flaws  that  lead  us  to  mistakenly  consume
                  investments,  drugs,  cars,  or  professionals  can  lead  us  to  mistakenly

                  consume claims, arguments, and opinions. And expert regulators have
                  an  apparently  similar  potential  to  help  people  by  identifying  and
                  removing poor choices from their available consumption options. Why

                  are we so eager to regulate so much individual behavior, yet so reluctant
                  to endorse censorship?




                  40
                       Hanson      R.   Why      Not    Censor?/     Robin     Hanson.     –   Available     at:
                  http://www.overcomingbias.com/2011/01/why-not-censor.html.
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186