Page 27 - 6871

3. In-depth analysis and evaluation of the manuscript by the editor.
4. Improvement of the manuscript by the author in accordance with the

comments made by the reviewer and the editor and correction of errors.
5. Analysis and evaluation of author's corrections, as well as determining the

suitability of the author's manuscript for printing. Most researchers argue that the
editor should help the author to convey to the reader their thoughts most fully and

accurately. In addition, according to Arkady Milchin, the powers of the editor

include:

1) determining the suitability of a work for publication;

2) the responsibility for the publication of the book, coordination of the

actions of other participants in its creation, that is, the organization of the process

of transforming the manuscript into a book. The specifics of editor's work largely

depend on the very material of editing - oil and gas works, media texts, advertising,

etc. Just the specifics of the genre often dictates the technique of editing it. In

addition, each editor produces his own style of editing, an individual manner, that

is, a special method of editing, which would be optimally suited to his work [9, p.

65].

6. Detailed, rigorous analysis and evaluation of each element of the

manuscript.

7. Correction by the author together with the editor of the manuscript in

detail or by the author of the final editorial work.

In the most general form, V. Rizun presents the following model of the

technological process of literary editing:

1. Editorial analysis, which includes:

1) the definition of the theme of the work;

2) analysis of the topic's disclosure;

3) editorial conclusion.

2. Editorial correction covering:

1) actualization of the theme and correction of the thematic structure of the

work;