Page 96 - 6727
P. 96

Economic Theory

            the higher the rate of inflation, the more often restaurants have to print new
            menus;
                  3) increased variability of relative prices:
            for example, suppose a firm issues a new catalog every January. If there is

            no inflation, then the firm’s prices  relative to the overall price level are
            constant over the year. Yet if inflation is 1 percent per month, then from

            the beginning to the end of the year the firm’s relative prices fall by 12
            percent. Sales from this catalog will tend to be low early in the year (when
            its prices are relatively high) and high later in the year (when its prices are
            relatively low). Hence, when inflation induces variability in relative prices,

            it leads to microeconomic inefficiencies in the allocation of resources;
                  4) unintended changes in tax liabilities due to nonindexation of the tax
            code,  confusion  and  inconvenience  resulting  from  a  changing  unit  of

            account:
                  suppose you buy some stock today and sell it a year from now at the
            same real price. It would seem reasonable for the government not to levy a
            tax, because you have earned no real income from this investment. Indeed,

            if  there  is  no  inflation,  a  zero  tax  liability  would  be  the  outcome.  But
            suppose the rate of inflation is 12 percent and you initially paid $100 per
            share for the stock; for the real price to be the same a year later, you must

            sell the stock for $112 per share. In this case the tax code, which ignores
            the effects of inflation, says that you have earned $12 per share in income,
            and the government taxes you on this capital gain. The problem is that the
            tax code measures income as the nominal rather than the real capital gain.

            In this example, and in many others, inflation distorts how taxes are levied;
                  5) inconvenience of living in a world with a changing price level:

            for  example,  a  changing  price  level  complicates  personal  financial
            planning. One important decision that all households face is how much of
            their income to consume today and how much to save for retirement. A
            dollar saved today and invested at a fixed nominal interest rate will yield a

            fixed dollar amount in the future. Yet the real value of that dollar amount –
            which will determine the retiree’s living standard – depends on the future
            price level. Deciding how much to save would be much simpler if people

            could count on the price level in 30 years being similar to its level today.
                  One benefit of inflation. Some economists believe that a little bit of
            inflation  –  say,  2  or  3  percent  per  year  –  can  be  a  good  thing.  The
            argument  for  moderate  inflation  starts  with  the  observation  that  cuts  in

            nominal wages is rare: firms are reluctant to cut their workers’ nominal
            wages, and workers are reluctant to accept such cuts. A 2-percent wage cut

                                                           96
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101