Page 30 - 6634
P. 30

These  structures  usually  have  four  to  eight  legs  battered  to  achieve  stability

               against toppling in waves. Main piles, which are tubular. are usually carried with

               the jackets and driven through the jacket legs into the seafloor.

                   The  term  jacket  structure  has  evolved  from  the  concept  of  providing  an

               enclosure (“jacket”) for the well conductors. These platforms generally support a

               superstructure  having  2  or  3  decks  with  drilling  and  production  equipment  and

               workover rigs.

                   The use of these platforms has generally been limited to a water depth of about

               500-600 ft (150-180 m) in the harsh North Sea environment (typical design wave

               of  100  ft/30  m).  In  the  more  intermediate  Gulf  of  Mexico  environment  (typical

               design  wave  of  75  ft/23  m)  half  a  dozen  jackets  have  been  installed  in  deeper

               water. The single piece Bullwinkle jacket weighs 49,375 tons and was installed at a


               site with 1350 ft (412 m) water depth in 1988.
                   For  the  marginal  field  development  in  shallow  water,  fixed  production


               platforms with a small deck are often used. At a  minimum these structures may
               support the following:


                   *  (1) a few wells typically less than 10;
                   *  (2) a small deck with enough space to handle a coil tubing or wireline unit;


                   *  (3) a test separator and a well header;

                   *  (4) a small crane;

                   *  (5) a boat landing;

                   *  (6) a minimum helideck.

                   Chevron carried out a study to identify and select, among existing production

               platform concepts, the ones that would optimise the development of fields in 150 ft

               (46 m) and 200 ft (61 m) of water, and for three different design return periods (25,

               50 and 100 years).

                   Next Figure 3/2 depicts three of these concepts.




                                                             30
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35