Page 21 - 6373
P. 21

Considering  that  on  the  value  of  anomaly  SP  except  K p
                            influenced many other factors, one of which is the resistance of the
                            drilling fluid, so it is advisable to use not the absolute value of the
                            SP anomaly but relative (Fig3.3).

                                                        SP
                                                SP
                                                                 SP
                                           ΔU rel = ΔU x / ΔU max <1,                              (3.2)

                                        SP
                            where:  ΔU x   –  SP  anomaly  to  the  reservoir  with  unknown  K p;
                                  SP
                            ΔU max  - SP anomaly with a known reservoir for K p (base layer
                            with a maximum value of K p).

                                                      ПС
                                                  U  від
                                             1.0
                                             0.8

                                             0.6

                                             0.4

                                             0.2

                                               0
                                                0         20       40  K  ,%
                                                                        п
                                                                      sp
                                          Figure 3.3 - Dependence ΔU  from K p

                            Method of GL

                                   As we know from the theory of this method, the intensity I γ
                            depends on the presence of clay in the reservoir (in clay-content
                            collectors). The more clay content collectors, the lower value of K p
                            and the greater value of gamma intensity.
                                   Thus,  for  these  collectors  exists  inverse  relationship
                            between the intensity of I γ and K p (Fig.3.4a).

















                                                           21
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26