Page 159 - 4187
P. 159

159

                    The view outlined above ... raises some questions as to the nature of P.
                    One added complexity ... presents itself, P.
                    Two factors ... appear to be at work in determining P.
                    An immediate problem ... with the view developed thus far is that P.
                    One reason for … rejecting the idea that P comes from the fact that Q.
               •     This fact can be accounted for ... by adopting F's constraints against Q.
                    These constraints ... appear to consist of PP.
                    This ... is supported by the fact that P.
                    This analysis accounts neatly ... for the (surprising) fact that P.
                    With respect to (the nature of) P, ... it is interesting to note that Q/ it is unlike
                     that Q.
                    Hence/ Thus, ... it is clear that R.
                      3.1.3 Cooperating

               •     Let  us  ...  first  consider  the  data/  ask  (address)  the  question  whether  P.
                     ...suppose that Р/ analyze the case involving Р/ apply this rule to P.
                    Let me try ... to present a slightly different picture.
                    As soon as ... we deal with cases involving P we are confronted with Q.
                    We can follow ... F in assuming that P.
                    When we consider P,  ... we find that Q.
               •     A second problem for the view that P ... is found when we examine Q.
                    One difference between P and Q is that R; ... we can explain this difference.
                    In order to explain this difference we look ... at the analysis proposed by F.
                    The relevant data are shown in [NN], ... where we see that P.
                    This leads us on to consider what ... will help us to account for P.
                    Now, with this view of P, ... we posit that Q.
                    Given this notion of P,  ... we can explain the lack of Q.
                    Another question arises, P;  ... to answer this question, we will first turn to Q.
                    Earlier ... we have posited the existence of P.
                    In this section ... we have seen that this restriction follows from P.
                    However, ... we have not yet argued that P.
               •     Now ... we are faced with the problem of (defining) P.
                    We ... must now consider the nature of Р/ will now compare P and Q.
                    We ... put aside for now the question of P.
                    Here ... we shall group together PP.
                    We need  ... to consider only Р/some other way of distinguishing P from Q.
                    We can ... now reconstruct Р/ advance the hypothesis that P.
                    We will  … see below that Р/ return to this question below.
                  ...consider each of these items in turn.
               •     If these observations are correct, as we will assume, ... then Q.
                    A consequence of this view is that ... we can account for the fact that P.
                    Thus ... we can posit/ infer/ predict/ conclude that P.
                      3.1.4 Modalities

               •     There are three ways ... in which the notion of P may be construed.
                    There may well be ... some significant relationship between P and Q.
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164