Page 128 - 4187
P. 128

128

                      ... indicates how P can really be fruitful.
                    We cannot ... really understand the nature of Q unless we understand P.
                    I am not ... really in a position to speak about P.
               •     This concept ... should be adequately and explicitly defined.
                    [NN] ... effectively covers the gap left by the theory of P.
                      P ... is effectively based on (decoded by) Q.
                    P and Q ... are exactly the same/ happened (occurred) exactly once.
                      ... correspond exactly to each other/ provide exactly the same type of R.
                      ...  are  arranged  in  exactly  the  same  way/  should  be  calculated  exactly.
                  F ... is keenly aware of the difficulties of postulating P.
                    P ... does not necessarily contain (imply) Q/is specifically associated with Q.
                      ... should be considered specifically from the point of view of Q.

                      2.1.2 Hedging/de-intensification
               •     Such studies have barely begun. Multimedia technology has just barely reached
                      the  point  of  P.  Some  historians  are  barely  aware  of  this  source  of  historical
                      inferences.
                    P ... occurs fairly regular/ has a fairly specific meaning.
                      ... is a fairly abstract study/ covers the problem fairly well.
                      ... is hardly acceptable (necessary/ ever used).
                    This ... will merely obscure Р/ could be done merely by accumulating data.
                    This  method  ...  gives  merely  probable  results.  Such  studies  are  very  nearly
                      lacking.
                    P  may  possibly  ...  have  only  Q.  This  notion/  definition  is  rather  vague
                      (controversial).
                    This constitutes ... a rather interesting case. F rather views Q as R.
                    The question ... is not whether P, but rather, Q.
                    The difference ... between P and Q is one of degree rather than kind.
               •     This ... is simply irrelevant/ is simply a comer term for P.
                      ...  amounts simply to juxtaposition.
                    PP ... are simply different subcategories of experiential phenomena.
                    Here ... we shall simply group PP.
                    Simply transferring P ... will be an expensive task.
               •     This gas ... is somehow leaking into the air.
                    This  distinction  ...  is  slightly  artificial  (different/  odd)/  presents  a  slightly
                      different picture.
                    This is ... a slightly odd form of Р/ a slightly less artificial model.
                      ... a slightly less integrated desktop.
                    P and Q ... are only weakly dependent.
               •     This research ... is basically descriptive/ comparative.
                    I am ... basically in disagreement with this view.
                    P ... is commonly accepted/ assumed/ exploited/ used.
                      ... is more frequent than commonly assumed.
                      ... is a commonly held belief/ is commonly defined as Q.
                      ... is customarily designated as Q.
               •     Philosophical discussions ... concentrate mainly on/ have mainly focused on P.
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133