Page 126 - 4187
P. 126

126

                     have,  in  proper  order,  its  Introduction,  Materials  and  Methods,  Results,  and
                     Discussion.  An  effective  way  to  proceed  in  writing  a  scientific  paper  is  to
                     answer these four questions, in order: 1) What was the problem? Your answer is
                     the Introduction. How did you study the problem? Your answer is the Materials
                     and Methods. What did you find? Your  answer is the Results. What do these
                     findings  mean?  Your answer is the Discussion.» [R.A.Day. How to write and
                     publish a scientific paper. Philadelphia, 1979].


                                     2 Reasoning, arguing, inferring, describing
                                 SPEECH PATTERNS & RHETORICAL DEVICES
                   (Evaluation, emphasis, intensification, parenthesis, deixis, inversion, impersonal
                  constructions, descriptions, negation, modalities, operators, connectors, links, etc.)

                      2.1 Emphasis; Operators

                      2.1.1 Intensification
               •     P is ... considerably more difficult to assess.
                    These measurements ... are considerably in error.
                    This approach …
                      …is essentially correct/ computational/ the same/ goal-directed.
                      ... proceeds through essentially three phases.
                      ... remains essentially unchanged.
                    F ... was essentially right in distinguishing P from Q.
                    Discussions of Q ... turn out to be essentially about P.
                    This technique ... can add greatly to the store of knowledge in this area.
                    These models ... differ greatly in P.
                    Contributions of F ... are greatly appreciated.
                    This view ... markedly advances our understanding of P.
                    P ... is significantly easier (greater) than Q/ significantly affects Q.
                          ... is used solely to signal Q.
                    This idea ... was vigorously debated/ defended/ denied by F.
                          ... flourished vigorously for several years.
               •     This scheme ... is broadly consistent with physiological evidence.
                    P ... is a broadly influential/ highly sophisticated (controversial) approach
                          ... is far less arbitrary (far more difficult to grasp) than Q.
                          ... is a far subtler phenomenon.
                          ... is far from being novel (a solution)/ extends far beyond our interests
                          ... is not practicable so far.
                    I ... fully agree with F/ am fully aware of the difficulties.
                    P should be … fully understood (discussed)/ elucidated more fully.
                    It seems ...h ighly probable/ desirable that P (because of Q).
                    This technique ... is highly complex (controversial/ original).
                          ... is highly developed in Europe.
                    F made ... highly detailed observations of social encounters.
                    This  problem  ...  is  still  left  largely  unaddressed  (unexplored)/  is  largely  a
                      question of P.
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131