Page 84 - 6689

83

68. Fish Stanley. How to do things with Austin and Searle: Speech- act theory and literary
critisism In: Is there a text in this class ? Harvard Univ. Press, 1980.
69. Fish Stanley. With the compliments of the author: Reflections on Austin and Derrida.
Linguistic Inquiry, 1982, 8.
70. Faber Richard N. Statements & what is stated Philosophical Studies 1972, 23 32 –
47
71. Forguson L.W. In pursuit of performatives In: Symposium on J.L.Austin Ed. K.T.Fann
New-York: Humanities Press Inc.,1969
72. Forrester Mary A note on condemnation & approval Ethics.1975 85 148 – 150
73. Fotion N. Master Speech Acts. Philosophical Quaterly. 1971, 21, N84, July, 233 – 243
74. Francik Ellen P. & Clark Herbert H. How to make Request That Overcome Obstacles
to Compliance j of memory & L:anguage 1985, 24, 5 Oct. 560 – 568
75. Francik Ellen P. & Clark Herbert H. How to make Request That Overcome Obstacles
to Compliance j of memory & L:anguage 1985, 24, 5 Oct. 560 – 568
76. Fraser B. An analysis of vernacular perf. Verbs In: Shuy R.W. & Bailey C.-J.N.(eds)
Towards tomorrow linguistics Washington D.C.:Georgetown University Press, 1974
139 – 158
77. Fraser B. An analysis of vernacular performative verbs. In: Towards tomorrow’s
linguistics. Wash. Georgetown Univ. press, 1974, p. 139-158
78. Fraser B. A partial analysis of vernacular performative verbs. – In: Towards tomorrow’s
linguistics. Washington. Georgetown University Press, 1974, p. 121-127
79. Fraser B. Hedged performatives. – In: Cole P. Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3. Speech
Acts New York etc., 1975. p. 187-210.
80. Fraser Bruce An examination of the performative analysis 1974 Papars in Linguistics ,
Edmounton Alberta 1974 7/1 1-40
81. Fraser Bruce, Ross Haj & Ulichny Polly Repeat performatives: Journal of pragmatics
1989, 13, 4, Aug. 651-653
82. Fries Udo On a typology of answers PICL 1978 Proceedings of the interact. Congress
of Linguists
83. Fries Udo On a typology of answers PICL 1978 Proceedings of the interact. Congress
of Linguists
84. Gale R. Do performative Utterances have any constantive function. Journal of
philosophy, 1976, vol. 87.
85. Garden G Heavy parentheses urp-out rules, okay? Linguistic and philosophy. 2 281 –
9
86. Gazdar G 1979 Pragmatics: Implicature, Presuppositions and Logical form. New
York, AcademicPress, 1979 Gw B831. 5.G39
87. Geis Michael L. Geis Michael L. A new Theory of Speech Acts Proceedings – Eastern
States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL) 1988, 5, 163 – 174
88. Giffs Raymond W. Jr. & Delaney Suzanne M. Pragmatic Factors in Making and
understanding Promises Discourse Processes 1987, 10, 1 jan.- mar. 107 – 126
89. Gillian Michell On the analysis of sentence adverbs: Evidence from explicit perf.
Sentences In: Fasold RW., Shuy R.W.(Ed. 1977, 184-197) Washington Georgetown
UP 1977 SH
90. Ginet Carl Performativity Linguistic & philosophy 1979, 3/2 245-265
91. Gingiss Peter. Indirect Threats On Word 1986, 37, 3, Dec. 153 – 158 Gothenburg
Studies in English