Page 118 - 6484
P. 118

To be successful, any change attempt will need to overcome resistance on the
               part of employees. Otherwise, the result will be loss of time and energy as well as an
               inability on the part of the organization to adapt to the changes in the environment
               and  make  its  operations  more  efficient.  Resistance  to  change  also  has  negative

               consequences  for  the  people  in  question.  Research  shows  that  when  people  react
               negatively to organizational change, they experience negative emotions, use sick time
                                                                                            [7]
               more often, and are more likely to voluntarily leave the company.   These negative
               effects  can  be  present  even  when  the  proposed  change  clearly  offers  benefits  and
               advantages over the status quo.
                      The following is a dramatic example of how resistance to change may prevent
               improving the status quo. Have you ever wondered why the keyboards we use are
               shaped the way they are? The QWERTY keyboard, named after the first six letters in
               the top row, was actually engineered to slow us down. When the typewriter was first
               invented in the 19th century, the first prototypes of the keyboard would jam if the
               keys right next to each other were hit at the same time. Therefore, it was important
               for  manufacturers  to  slow  typists  down.  They  achieved  this  by  putting  the  most
               commonly used letters to the left-hand side and scattering the most frequently used
               letters all over the keyboard. Later, the issue of letters being stuck was resolved. In
               fact,  an  alternative  to  the  QWERTY  developed  in  the  1930s  by  educational
               psychologist  August  Dvorak  provides  a  much  more  efficient  design  and  allows
               individuals  to  double  traditional  typing  speeds.  Yet  the  Dvorak  keyboard  never
               gained wide acceptance. The reasons? Large numbers of people resisted the change.
               Teachers and typists resisted because they would lose their specialized knowledge.
               Manufacturers  resisted  due  to  costs  inherent  in  making  the  switch  and  the  initial
                                                        [8]
               inefficiencies in the learning curve.   In short, the best idea does not necessarily win,
               and changing people requires understanding why they resist.
                      Figure 7.11




























                      Dvorak keyboard is a more efficient alternative to keyboard design. However,
               due  to  resistance  from  typists,  teachers,  manufacturers,  and  salespeople,  a  switch
               never occurred.
                      © 2010 Jupiterimages Corporation

                                                              118
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123