Page 94 - 4660
P. 94

Estimation


               One-Sided Confidence Bounds. The confidence interval in (2.20) gives both a lower confidence
               bound and an upper confidence bound for µ. Thus, it provides a two-sided CI. It is also possible to
               obtain one-sided confidence bounds for µ by setting either l = −∞ or u = ∞ and replacing z α/2
               by z α .
                   A 100(1 − α)% upper-confidence bound for µ is
                                                                       √
                                                     µ ≤ u = ¯x + z α σ/ n                                (2.22)


               and a 100(1 − α)% lower-confidence bound for µ is

                                                              √
                                                     ¯ x − z α σ/ n = l ≤ µ.                              (2.23)

               Example 2.7. One-Sided Confidence Bound: the same data for impact testing from
               Example 2.5 are used to construct a lower, one-sided 95% confidence interval for
               the mean impact energy. Recall that ¯x = 64.46, σ = 1J, and n = 10. The interval is
                       σ                     1
                ¯ x − z α  √ ≤ µ, 64.46 − 1.64 √  ≤ µ, 63.94 ≤ µ,
                        n                    10
                   Practical Interpretation: The lower limit for the two-sided interval in Example
               2.5 was 63.84. Because z α < z α/2 , the lower limit of a one-sided interval is always
               greater than the lower limit of a two-sided interval of equal confidence.                    The
               one- sided interval does not bound µ from above so that it still achieves 95%
               confidence with a slightly greater lower limit. If our interest is only in the
               lower limit for µ, then the one-sided interval is preferred because it provides
               equal confidence with a greater lower limit. Similarly, a one-sided upper limit
               is always less than a two-sided upper limit of equal confidence.                               ,


               General Method to Derive a Confidence Interval. It is easy to give a general method for finding
               a confidence interval for an unknown parameter θ. Let X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n be a random sample of n
               observations. Suppose we can find a statistic g(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ; θ) with the following properties:
                  1. g(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ; θ) depends on both the sample and µ.
                  2. The probability distribution of g(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ; θ) does not depend on µ or any other
                     unknown parameter.
               In the case considered in this section, the parameter θ = µ. The random variable
                                                                                √
                                                                    ¯
                                           g(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ; µ) = (X − µ)/(σ/ n)

               and satisfies both conditions above; it depends on the sample and on µ, and it has a standard
               normal distribution since σ is known. Now one must find constants C L and C U so that


                                         P[C L ≤ g(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ; θ) ≤ C u ] = 1 − α           (2.24)


               Because of property 2, CL and CU do not depend on θ. In our example, C L = −z α/2 and C U = z α/2 .
               Finally, you must manipulate the inequalities in the probability statement so that


                                   P[L(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ) ≤ θ ≤ U(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n )] = 1 − α.  (2.25)


               This gives L(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ) and U(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ) as the lower and upper confidence limits
               defining the 100(1 − α)% confidence interval for θ. The quantity g(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ; θ) is often
               called a ”pivotal quantity” because we pivot on this quantity in (2.24) to produce (2.25). In our
                                                                                             √
                                                                              ¯
               example,     we    manipulated    the   pivotal   quantity   (X     −   µ)/(σ n)     to   obtain
                                                                                          √
                                                 √
                                      ¯
                                                                                ¯
               L(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ) = X − z α/2 σ/ n and U(X 1 , X 2 , . . . , X n ) = X + z α/2 σ/ n.
                                                              94
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99